From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42BFCC2BB40 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:30:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11FA423AA8 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:30:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729460AbgLHNaQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 08:30:16 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49190 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726080AbgLHNaO (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 08:30:14 -0500 From: Will Deacon Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=permerror (bad message/signature format) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , Marc Zyngier , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Peter Zijlstra , Morten Rasmussen , Qais Yousef , Suren Baghdasaryan , Quentin Perret , Tejun Heo , Li Zefan , Johannes Weiner , Ingo Molnar , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , kernel-team@android.com Subject: [PATCH v5 08/15] cpuset: Honour task_cpu_possible_mask() in guarantee_online_cpus() Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:28:28 +0000 Message-Id: <20201208132835.6151-9-will@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20201208132835.6151-1-will@kernel.org> References: <20201208132835.6151-1-will@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Asymmetric systems may not offer the same level of userspace ISA support across all CPUs, meaning that some applications cannot be executed by some CPUs. As a concrete example, upcoming arm64 big.LITTLE designs do not feature support for 32-bit applications on both clusters. Modify guarantee_online_cpus() to take task_cpu_possible_mask() into account when trying to find a suitable set of online CPUs for a given task. This will avoid passing an invalid mask to set_cpus_allowed_ptr() during ->attach() and will subsequently allow the cpuset hierarchy to be taken into account when forcefully overriding the affinity mask for a task which requires migration to a compatible CPU. Cc: Li Zefan Cc: Tejun Heo Cc: Johannes Weiner Signed-off-by: Will Deacon --- include/linux/cpuset.h | 3 ++- kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++-------------- 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/cpuset.h b/include/linux/cpuset.h index 04c20de66afc..414a8e694413 100644 --- a/include/linux/cpuset.h +++ b/include/linux/cpuset.h @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #ifdef CONFIG_CPUSETS @@ -184,7 +185,7 @@ static inline void cpuset_read_unlock(void) { } static inline void cpuset_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, struct cpumask *mask) { - cpumask_copy(mask, cpu_possible_mask); + cpumask_copy(mask, task_cpu_possible_mask(p)); } static inline void cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback(struct task_struct *p) diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c index e970737c3ed2..d30febf1f69f 100644 --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c @@ -372,18 +372,26 @@ static inline bool is_in_v2_mode(void) } /* - * Return in pmask the portion of a cpusets's cpus_allowed that - * are online. If none are online, walk up the cpuset hierarchy - * until we find one that does have some online cpus. + * Return in pmask the portion of a task's cpusets's cpus_allowed that + * are online and are capable of running the task. If none are found, + * walk up the cpuset hierarchy until we find one that does have some + * appropriate cpus. * * One way or another, we guarantee to return some non-empty subset * of cpu_online_mask. * * Call with callback_lock or cpuset_mutex held. */ -static void guarantee_online_cpus(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpumask *pmask) +static void guarantee_online_cpus(struct task_struct *tsk, + struct cpumask *pmask) { - while (!cpumask_intersects(cs->effective_cpus, cpu_online_mask)) { + struct cpuset *cs = task_cs(tsk); + const struct cpumask *possible_mask = task_cpu_possible_mask(tsk); + + if (WARN_ON(!cpumask_and(pmask, possible_mask, cpu_online_mask))) + cpumask_copy(pmask, cpu_online_mask); + + while (!cpumask_intersects(cs->effective_cpus, pmask)) { cs = parent_cs(cs); if (unlikely(!cs)) { /* @@ -393,11 +401,10 @@ static void guarantee_online_cpus(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpumask *pmask) * cpuset's effective_cpus is on its way to be * identical to cpu_online_mask. */ - cpumask_copy(pmask, cpu_online_mask); return; } } - cpumask_and(pmask, cs->effective_cpus, cpu_online_mask); + cpumask_and(pmask, pmask, cs->effective_cpus); } /* @@ -2176,15 +2183,13 @@ static void cpuset_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset) percpu_down_write(&cpuset_rwsem); - /* prepare for attach */ - if (cs == &top_cpuset) - cpumask_copy(cpus_attach, cpu_possible_mask); - else - guarantee_online_cpus(cs, cpus_attach); - guarantee_online_mems(cs, &cpuset_attach_nodemask_to); cgroup_taskset_for_each(task, css, tset) { + if (cs != &top_cpuset) + guarantee_online_cpus(task, cpus_attach); + else + cpumask_copy(cpus_attach, task_cpu_possible_mask(task)); /* * can_attach beforehand should guarantee that this doesn't * fail. TODO: have a better way to handle failure here @@ -3280,7 +3285,7 @@ void cpuset_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *tsk, struct cpumask *pmask) spin_lock_irqsave(&callback_lock, flags); rcu_read_lock(); - guarantee_online_cpus(task_cs(tsk), pmask); + guarantee_online_cpus(tsk, pmask); rcu_read_unlock(); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&callback_lock, flags); } -- 2.29.2.576.ga3fc446d84-goog