From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B6FBC4361B for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 14:51:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 444FC23A6C for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 14:51:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729640AbgLHOv1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 09:51:27 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40910 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726080AbgLHOv1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 09:51:27 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07DA3C061749; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 06:50:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=sm5ylG4LyLpBWgCJ8nF1i/lYdpFR+VS2lu9SrvWQeB0=; b=Yts/GSDgA8COPDOd2yB7VQ+SZ9 5x0Eu8mvT2qexks4umgJwQrtdEWvoFuDco1dnZnxARWDUKA5aBbzh00UzcnTyKVCtmWfRhszm0K3j EsI/3oi4F6j1G+1KqbImPy/J0Od5nTC5FOgVaDuahggm57KqEK4R4/fFUOSvGvVOxf+HwsDPuC1MQ +eSzEA9i+BDWXqmLjJbxvEhxCuwdzP/0+kcZkdFJYpBV2gNaYrZtq8Qq0+Q/CYzlJdYvyNF8Y/tQy 4vuu92Z0niD+xkkWUwM8Erb1mR5RQOVV44k48+S+LwQF9F03/j/d3jJ48b03fSj6KCROM18eW9pac jfkrWzJg==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kmeJt-0003IW-71; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 14:50:25 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D1E6305C10; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 15:50:24 +0100 (CET) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 75F4721ADBEA0; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 15:50:24 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 15:50:24 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Ingo Molnar , Vincent Guittot , Amit Daniel Kachhap , Amit Kucheria , Ben Segall , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , Daniel Lezcano , Dietmar Eggemann , Javi Merino , Juri Lelli , Mel Gorman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Steven Rostedt , Zhang Rui , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Quentin Perret , Lukasz Luba , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/3] cpufreq_cooling: Get effective CPU utilization from scheduler Message-ID: <20201208145024.GD2414@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:46:54AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Viresh Kumar (3): > sched/core: Move schedutil_cpu_util() to core.c > sched/core: Rename schedutil_cpu_util() and allow rest of the kernel > to use it > thermal: cpufreq_cooling: Reuse sched_cpu_util() for SMP platforms How should we go about merging this? Do I take the lot, or do we go muck about with topic branches?