From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A689C4167B for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 17:23:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6DE207D8 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 17:23:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729401AbgLHRXd (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 12:23:33 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:46494 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728510AbgLHRXc (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 12:23:32 -0500 IronPort-SDR: k2OaVScCk5FhknST8x3ZNPTDFlBJ/0jwRkrAoYOxpIIPTOIXwx3UcFAK20CAEGexujISkS7QRX ZoRnGoEMSw1Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9829"; a="174079650" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,403,1599548400"; d="scan'208";a="174079650" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Dec 2020 09:22:51 -0800 IronPort-SDR: 4tMCT8vGceU6karZIafhKmMgXOvVyLb2LYUpW4elgkPoxwOmo0p3IPPIPJd/KFUP4xOgwuEKcz tsRuwAPBPm3Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,403,1599548400"; d="scan'208";a="363733327" Received: from iweiny-desk2.sc.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.3.52.147]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Dec 2020 09:22:51 -0800 Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 09:22:51 -0800 From: Ira Weiny To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Fenghua Yu , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Dan Williams , Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 00/10] PKS: Add Protection Keys Supervisor (PKS) support V3 Message-ID: <20201208172250.GA2032506@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> References: <20201106232908.364581-1-ira.weiny@intel.com> <20201207221431.GL1563847@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> <87v9dc2sxh.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87v9dc2sxh.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1 (2018-12-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 04:55:54PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Ira, > > On Mon, Dec 07 2020 at 14:14, Ira Weiny wrote: > > Is there any chance of this landing before the kmap stuff gets sorted out? > > I have marked this as needs an update because the change log of 5/10 > sucks. https://lore.kernel.org/r/87lff1xcmv.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de > > > It would be nice to have this in 5.11 to build off of. > > It would be nice if people follow up on review request :) I did, but just as an update to that patch.[1] Sorry if this caused you to miss the response. It would have been better for me to ping you on that patch. :-/ I was trying to avoid a whole new series just for that single commit message. Is that generally ok? Is that commit message still lacking? Ira [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/20201124060956.1405768-1-ira.weiny@intel.com/