Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Implement the pwm_chip

[Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>]

On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 10:40:22PM -0600, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> The SN65DSI86 provides the ability to supply a PWM signal on GPIO 4,
> with the primary purpose of controlling the backlight of the attached
> panel. Add an implementation that exposes this using the standard PWM
> framework, to allow e.g. pwm-backlight to expose this to the user.
> 
> Special thanks to Doug Anderson for suggestions related to the involved
> math.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 202 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 202 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> index f27306c51e4d..43c0acba57ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
>   * datasheet: https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/sn65dsi86.pdf
>   */
>  
> +#include <linux/atomic.h>
>  #include <linux/bits.h>
>  #include <linux/clk.h>
>  #include <linux/debugfs.h>
> @@ -14,6 +15,7 @@
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/of_graph.h>
>  #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> +#include <linux/pwm.h>
>  #include <linux/regmap.h>
>  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>  
> @@ -89,6 +91,11 @@
>  #define SN_ML_TX_MODE_REG			0x96
>  #define  ML_TX_MAIN_LINK_OFF			0
>  #define  ML_TX_NORMAL_MODE			BIT(0)
> +#define SN_PWM_PRE_DIV_REG			0xA0
> +#define SN_BACKLIGHT_SCALE_REG			0xA1
> +#define  BACKLIGHT_SCALE_MAX			0xFFFF
> +#define SN_BACKLIGHT_REG			0xA3
> +#define SN_PWM_EN_INV_REG			0xA5
>  #define SN_AUX_CMD_STATUS_REG			0xF4
>  #define  AUX_IRQ_STATUS_AUX_RPLY_TOUT		BIT(3)
>  #define  AUX_IRQ_STATUS_AUX_SHORT		BIT(5)
> @@ -111,6 +118,8 @@
>  
>  #define SN_LINK_TRAINING_TRIES		10
>  
> +#define SN_PWM_GPIO			3

So this maps to the GPIO4 described in sn65dsi86 datasheet.  I'm
wondering if it's more readable to define the following SHIFT constants
(your code), and use GPIO_MUX_GPIO4_SHIFT >> 2 where you need GPIO
offset?

#define  GPIO_MUX_GPIO1_SHIFT	0
#define  GPIO_MUX_GPIO2_SHIFT	2
#define  GPIO_MUX_GPIO3_SHIFT	4
#define  GPIO_MUX_GPIO4_SHIFT	6

If you agree, you may consider to integrate this patch beforehand:

https://github.com/shawnguo2/linux/commit/7cde887ffb3b27a36e77a08bee3666d14968b586


Shawn

> +
>  /**
>   * struct ti_sn_bridge - Platform data for ti-sn65dsi86 driver.
>   * @dev:          Pointer to our device.
> @@ -162,6 +171,12 @@ struct ti_sn_bridge {
>  	struct gpio_chip		gchip;
>  	DECLARE_BITMAP(gchip_output, SN_NUM_GPIOS);
>  #endif
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PWM)
> +	struct pwm_chip			pchip;
> +	bool				pwm_enabled;
> +	unsigned int			pwm_refclk;
> +	atomic_t			pwm_pin_busy;
> +#endif
>  };
>  
>  static const struct regmap_range ti_sn_bridge_volatile_ranges[] = {
> @@ -499,6 +514,14 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_set_refclk_freq(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata)
>  
>  	regmap_update_bits(pdata->regmap, SN_DPPLL_SRC_REG, REFCLK_FREQ_MASK,
>  			   REFCLK_FREQ(i));
> +
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PWM)
> +	/*
> +	 * The PWM refclk is based on the value written to SN_DPPLL_SRC_REG,
> +	 * regardless of its actual sourcing.
> +	 */
> +	pdata->pwm_refclk = ti_sn_bridge_refclk_lut[i];
> +#endif
>  }
>  
>  static void ti_sn_bridge_set_dsi_rate(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata)
> @@ -981,6 +1004,161 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_parse_dsi_host(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PWM)
> +static int ti_sn_pwm_pin_request(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata)
> +{
> +	return atomic_xchg(&pdata->pwm_pin_busy, 1) ? -EBUSY : 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void ti_sn_pwm_pin_release(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata)
> +{
> +	atomic_set(&pdata->pwm_pin_busy, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static struct ti_sn_bridge *
> +pwm_chip_to_ti_sn_bridge(struct pwm_chip *chip)
> +{
> +	return container_of(chip, struct ti_sn_bridge, pchip);
> +}
> +
> +static int ti_sn_pwm_request(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> +{
> +	struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata = pwm_chip_to_ti_sn_bridge(chip);
> +
> +	return ti_sn_pwm_pin_request(pdata);
> +}
> +
> +static void ti_sn_pwm_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> +{
> +	struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata = pwm_chip_to_ti_sn_bridge(chip);
> +
> +	ti_sn_pwm_pin_release(pdata);
> +}
> +
> +static int ti_sn_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> +			   const struct pwm_state *state)
> +{
> +	struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata = pwm_chip_to_ti_sn_bridge(chip);
> +	unsigned int pwm_en_inv;
> +	unsigned int backlight;
> +	unsigned int pwm_freq;
> +	unsigned int pre_div;
> +	unsigned int scale;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!pdata->pwm_enabled) {
> +		ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(pdata->dev);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		ret = regmap_update_bits(pdata->regmap, SN_GPIO_CTRL_REG,
> +					 SN_GPIO_MUX_MASK << (2 * SN_PWM_GPIO),
> +					 SN_GPIO_MUX_SPECIAL << (2 * SN_PWM_GPIO));
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(pdata->dev, "failed to mux in PWM function\n");
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	if (state->enabled) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Per the datasheet the PWM frequency is given by:
> +		 *
> +		 * PWM_FREQ = REFCLK_FREQ / (PWM_PRE_DIV * BACKLIGHT_SCALE + 1)
> +		 *
> +		 * In order to find the PWM_FREQ that best suits the requested
> +		 * state->period, the PWM_PRE_DIV is calculated with the
> +		 * maximum possible number of steps (BACKLIGHT_SCALE_MAX). The
> +		 * actual BACKLIGHT_SCALE is then adjusted down to match the
> +		 * requested period.
> +		 *
> +		 * The BACKLIGHT value is then calculated against the
> +		 * BACKLIGHT_SCALE, based on the requested duty_cycle and
> +		 * period.
> +		 */
> +		pwm_freq = NSEC_PER_SEC / state->period;
> +		pre_div = DIV_ROUND_UP(pdata->pwm_refclk / pwm_freq - 1, BACKLIGHT_SCALE_MAX);
> +		scale = (pdata->pwm_refclk / pwm_freq - 1) / pre_div;
> +
> +		backlight = scale * state->duty_cycle / state->period;
> +
> +		ret = regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_PWM_PRE_DIV_REG, pre_div);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(pdata->dev, "failed to update PWM_PRE_DIV\n");
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +
> +		ti_sn_bridge_write_u16(pdata, SN_BACKLIGHT_SCALE_REG, scale);
> +		ti_sn_bridge_write_u16(pdata, SN_BACKLIGHT_REG, backlight);
> +	}
> +
> +	pwm_en_inv = FIELD_PREP(BIT(1), !!state->enabled) |
> +		     FIELD_PREP(BIT(0), state->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED);
> +	ret = regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_PWM_EN_INV_REG, pwm_en_inv);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(pdata->dev, "failed to update PWM_EN/PWM_INV\n");
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	pdata->pwm_enabled = !!state->enabled;
> +out:
> +
> +	if (!pdata->pwm_enabled)
> +		pm_runtime_put_sync(pdata->dev);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct pwm_ops ti_sn_pwm_ops = {
> +	.request = ti_sn_pwm_request,
> +	.free = ti_sn_pwm_free,
> +	.apply = ti_sn_pwm_apply,
> +	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +};
> +
> +static struct pwm_device *ti_sn_pwm_of_xlate(struct pwm_chip *pc,
> +					     const struct of_phandle_args *args)
> +{
> +	struct pwm_device *pwm;
> +
> +	if (args->args_count != 1)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> +	pwm = pwm_request_from_chip(pc, 0, NULL);
> +	if (IS_ERR(pwm))
> +		return pwm;
> +
> +	pwm->args.period = args->args[0];
> +
> +	return pwm;
> +}
> +
> +static int ti_sn_setup_pwmchip(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata)
> +{
> +	pdata->pchip.dev = pdata->dev;
> +	pdata->pchip.ops = &ti_sn_pwm_ops;
> +	pdata->pchip.base = -1;
> +	pdata->pchip.npwm = 1;
> +	pdata->pchip.of_xlate = ti_sn_pwm_of_xlate;
> +	pdata->pchip.of_pwm_n_cells = 1;
> +
> +	return pwmchip_add(&pdata->pchip);
> +}
> +
> +static void ti_sn_remove_pwmchip(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata)
> +{
> +	pwmchip_remove(&pdata->pchip);
> +
> +	if (pdata->pwm_enabled)
> +		pm_runtime_put_sync(pdata->dev);
> +}
> +#else
> +static int ti_sn_pwm_pin_request(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata) { return 0; }
> +static void ti_sn_pwm_pin_release(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata) {}
> +static int ti_sn_setup_pwmchip(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata) { return 0; }
> +static void ti_sn_remove_pwmchip(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata) {}
> +#endif
> +
>  #if defined(CONFIG_OF_GPIO)
>  
>  static int tn_sn_bridge_of_xlate(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> @@ -1113,10 +1291,25 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int ti_sn_bridge_gpio_request(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
> +{
> +	struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +
> +	if (offset == SN_PWM_GPIO)
> +		return ti_sn_pwm_pin_request(pdata);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static void ti_sn_bridge_gpio_free(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
>  {
> +	struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +
>  	/* We won't keep pm_runtime if we're input, so switch there on free */
>  	ti_sn_bridge_gpio_direction_input(chip, offset);
> +
> +	if (offset == SN_PWM_GPIO)
> +		ti_sn_pwm_pin_release(pdata);
>  }
>  
>  static const char * const ti_sn_bridge_gpio_names[SN_NUM_GPIOS] = {
> @@ -1136,6 +1329,7 @@ static int ti_sn_setup_gpio_controller(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata)
>  	pdata->gchip.owner = THIS_MODULE;
>  	pdata->gchip.of_xlate = tn_sn_bridge_of_xlate;
>  	pdata->gchip.of_gpio_n_cells = 2;
> +	pdata->gchip.request = ti_sn_bridge_gpio_request;
>  	pdata->gchip.free = ti_sn_bridge_gpio_free;
>  	pdata->gchip.get_direction = ti_sn_bridge_gpio_get_direction;
>  	pdata->gchip.direction_input = ti_sn_bridge_gpio_direction_input;
> @@ -1282,6 +1476,12 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> +	ret = ti_sn_setup_pwmchip(pdata);
> +	if (ret)  {
> +		pm_runtime_disable(pdata->dev);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
>  	i2c_set_clientdata(client, pdata);
>  
>  	pdata->aux.name = "ti-sn65dsi86-aux";
> @@ -1320,6 +1520,8 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>  
>  	drm_bridge_remove(&pdata->bridge);
>  
> +	ti_sn_remove_pwmchip(pdata);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.29.2
>