From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B72ECC0018C for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 14:51:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DB792310D for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 14:51:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2391829AbgLJOvG (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Dec 2020 09:51:06 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35346 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2391675AbgLJOtK (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Dec 2020 09:49:10 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16C3EC061794 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 06:48:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Message-ID: Sender:Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References; bh=yn1qH04jjjmkAXAfwbqdVLSx2R9x3N7TiVfDrsMpX+E=; b=Wi5MrpNuNIzVubde2t4JG+MhSL G2i9j0pS6csU5+hLILJYOYD/LZUnIilk/5AZbGv6gFiXyncSjcLI+ZmPho2KislHkydYKV8IFPUC6 YRshqvhRp6xmuoqNARPVYx26LqEWxOpELm19GBdL3953lgG/kvU5MmVHAeYVbT6X/V0EX/vtwCSbX w3YvOmQ/qDkcfx0WMipdubRMiDPgT4idwDjynztdOrfSowGikTgGoRgryysrLzk8G4p92Lbbp8otJ 7Eghbwtw8YBjeywiixFDavNQ5rtGVApszF7nQmnviEDxntY2c8pTVtiOA5AZSSuYQ+JaVdWKS5qhb WRFjiyHQ==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1knNF5-00044V-4G; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 14:48:27 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCE63304D58; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:48:25 +0100 (CET) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 0) id C33D72BAB36D0; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:48:25 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <20201210144254.583402167@infradead.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:42:54 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: mingo@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, bigeasy@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 0/6] Fix lockdep vs local_lock_t Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, After a few days of confusion, here are patches that (hopefully!) teach lockdep about local_lock_t.