From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71097C433FE for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 10:33:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C6923ED0 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 10:33:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730066AbgLKKdD (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Dec 2020 05:33:03 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:48276 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726642AbgLKKci (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Dec 2020 05:32:38 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ADB330E; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 02:31:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from usa.arm.com (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 18ECF3F68F; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 02:31:51 -0800 (PST) From: Sudeep Holla To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Sudeep Holla , Nicolas Ferre , Alexandre Belloni , Ludovic Desroches Subject: [PATCH] drivers: soc: atmel: Avoid calling at91_soc_init on non AT91 SoCs Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 10:31:43 +0000 Message-Id: <20201211103143.1332302-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Since at91_soc_init is called unconditionally from atmel_soc_device_init, we get the following warning on all non AT91 SoCs: " AT91: Could not find identification node" Fix the same by filtering with allowed AT91 SoC list. Cc: Nicolas Ferre Cc: Alexandre Belloni Cc: Ludovic Desroches Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla --- drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c b/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c index c4472b68b7c2..ba9fc07cd91c 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c +++ b/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c @@ -271,8 +271,19 @@ struct soc_device * __init at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs) return soc_dev; } +static const struct of_device_id at91_soc_allowed_list[] __initconst = { + { .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200", }, + { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260", }, + { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d2", }, +}; + static int __init atmel_soc_device_init(void) { + struct device_node *np = of_find_node_by_path("/"); + + if (!of_match_node(at91_soc_allowed_list, np)) + return 0; + at91_soc_init(socs); return 0; -- 2.25.1