From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF95CC433FE for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 11:46:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89FD023F28 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 11:46:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2395181AbgLKLqP (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Dec 2020 06:46:15 -0500 Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.193]:18723 "EHLO relay1-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389984AbgLKLp5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Dec 2020 06:45:57 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 86.194.74.19 Received: from localhost (lfbn-lyo-1-997-19.w86-194.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.194.74.19]) (Authenticated sender: alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com) by relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 83978240006; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 11:45:15 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 12:45:15 +0100 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Sudeep Holla Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Ferre , Ludovic Desroches Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: soc: atmel: Avoid calling at91_soc_init on non AT91 SoCs Message-ID: <20201211114515.GF1781038@piout.net> References: <20201211103143.1332302-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201211103143.1332302-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On 11/12/2020 10:31:43+0000, Sudeep Holla wrote: > Since at91_soc_init is called unconditionally from atmel_soc_device_init, > we get the following warning on all non AT91 SoCs: > " AT91: Could not find identification node" > > Fix the same by filtering with allowed AT91 SoC list. > > Cc: Nicolas Ferre > Cc: Alexandre Belloni > Cc: Ludovic Desroches > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla > --- > drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c | 11 +++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c b/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c > index c4472b68b7c2..ba9fc07cd91c 100644 > --- a/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c > +++ b/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c > @@ -271,8 +271,19 @@ struct soc_device * __init at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs) > return soc_dev; > } > > +static const struct of_device_id at91_soc_allowed_list[] __initconst = { > + { .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200", }, > + { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260", }, > + { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d2", }, This is a very small subset of the supported SoCs. a proper list would be: atmel,at91rm9200 atmel,at91sam9 atmel,sama5 atmel,samv7 -- Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com