Hi all, On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 14:25:30 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in: > > arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h > > between commit: > > b5a5a01d8e9a ("arm64: uaccess: remove addr_limit_user_check()") > > from the arm64 tree and commit: > > 192caabd4dd9 ("arm64: add support for TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL") > > from the block tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > complex conflicts. > > diff --cc arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h > index 015beafe58f5,cdcf307764aa..000000000000 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h > @@@ -63,7 -66,9 +63,8 @@@ void arch_release_task_struct(struct ta > #define TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME 2 /* callback before returning to user */ > #define TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE 3 /* CPU's FP state is not current's */ > #define TIF_UPROBE 4 /* uprobe breakpoint or singlestep */ > - #define TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT 5 /* MTE Asynchronous Tag Check Fault */ > -#define TIF_FSCHECK 5 /* Check FS is USER_DS on return */ > ++#define TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL 5 /* signal notifications exist */ > + #define TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT 6 /* MTE Asynchronous Tag Check Fault */ > -#define TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL 7 /* signal notifications exist */ > #define TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE 8 /* syscall trace active */ > #define TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT 9 /* syscall auditing */ > #define TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT 10 /* syscall tracepoint for ftrace */ > @@@ -96,7 -103,8 +98,8 @@@ > > #define _TIF_WORK_MASK (_TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_SIGPENDING | \ > _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME | _TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE | \ > - _TIF_UPROBE | _TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT) > - _TIF_UPROBE | _TIF_FSCHECK | _TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT | \ > ++ _TIF_UPROBE | _TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT | \ > + _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL) > > #define _TIF_SYSCALL_WORK (_TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE | _TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT | \ > _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT | _TIF_SECCOMP | \ Just a reminder that this conflict still exists. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell