linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: corbet@lwn.net, mike.kravetz@oracle.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, luto@kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, paulmck@kernel.org,
	mchehab+huawei@kernel.org, pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com,
	rdunlap@infradead.org, oneukum@suse.com,
	anshuman.khandual@arm.com, jroedel@suse.de,
	almasrymina@google.com, rientjes@google.com, willy@infradead.org,
	mhocko@suse.com, song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com, david@redhat.com,
	naoya.horiguchi@nec.com, duanxiongchun@bytedance.com,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 04/11] mm/hugetlb: Defer freeing of HugeTLB pages
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 11:27:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201221102703.GA15804@linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201217121303.13386-5-songmuchun@bytedance.com>

On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 08:12:56PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> In the subsequent patch, we will allocate the vmemmap pages when free
> HugeTLB pages. But update_and_free_page() is called from a non-task
> context(and hold hugetlb_lock), so we can defer the actual freeing in
> a workqueue to prevent from using GFP_ATOMIC to allocate the vmemmap
> pages.

I think we would benefit from a more complete changelog, at least I had
to stare at the code for a while in order to grasp what are we trying
to do and the reasons behind.

> +static void __free_hugepage(struct hstate *h, struct page *page);
> +
> +/*
> + * As update_and_free_page() is be called from a non-task context(and hold
> + * hugetlb_lock), we can defer the actual freeing in a workqueue to prevent
> + * use GFP_ATOMIC to allocate a lot of vmemmap pages.

The above implies that update_and_free_page() is __always__ called from a 
non-task context, but that is not always the case?

> +static void update_hpage_vmemmap_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
> -	int i;
> +	struct llist_node *node;
> +	struct page *page;
>  
> +	node = llist_del_all(&hpage_update_freelist);
> +
> +	while (node) {
> +		page = container_of((struct address_space **)node,
> +				     struct page, mapping);
> +		node = node->next;
> +		page->mapping = NULL;
> +		__free_hugepage(page_hstate(page), page);
> +
> +		cond_resched();
> +	}
> +}
> +static DECLARE_WORK(hpage_update_work, update_hpage_vmemmap_workfn);

I wonder if this should be moved to hugetlb_vmemmap.c

> +/*
> + * This is where the call to allocate vmemmmap pages will be inserted.
> + */

I think this should go in the changelog.

> +static void __free_hugepage(struct hstate *h, struct page *page)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
>  	for (i = 0; i < pages_per_huge_page(h); i++) {
>  		page[i].flags &= ~(1 << PG_locked | 1 << PG_error |
>  				1 << PG_referenced | 1 << PG_dirty |
> @@ -1313,13 +1377,17 @@ static void update_and_free_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page)
>  	set_page_refcounted(page);
>  	if (hstate_is_gigantic(h)) {
>  		/*
> -		 * Temporarily drop the hugetlb_lock, because
> -		 * we might block in free_gigantic_page().
> +		 * Temporarily drop the hugetlb_lock only when this type of
> +		 * HugeTLB page does not support vmemmap optimization (which
> +		 * context do not hold the hugetlb_lock), because we might
> +		 * block in free_gigantic_page().

"
 /*
  * Temporarily drop the hugetlb_lock, because we might block
  * in free_gigantic_page(). Only drop it in case the vmemmap
  * optimization is disabled, since that context does not hold
  * the lock.
  */
" ?

 
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-21 10:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-17 12:12 [PATCH v10 00/11] Free some vmemmap pages of HugeTLB page Muchun Song
2020-12-17 12:12 ` [PATCH v10 01/11] mm/memory_hotplug: Factor out bootmem core functions to bootmem_info.c Muchun Song
2020-12-17 12:12 ` [PATCH v10 02/11] mm/hugetlb: Introduce a new config HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE_VMEMMAP Muchun Song
2020-12-18 15:41   ` Oscar Salvador
2020-12-21 23:56   ` Mike Kravetz
2020-12-17 12:12 ` [PATCH v10 03/11] mm/hugetlb: Free the vmemmap pages associated with each HugeTLB page Muchun Song
2020-12-21  9:11   ` Oscar Salvador
2020-12-21 11:25     ` [External] " Muchun Song
2020-12-21 13:43       ` Oscar Salvador
2020-12-21 15:52         ` Muchun Song
2020-12-21 18:00           ` Oscar Salvador
2020-12-22  1:03             ` Mike Kravetz
2020-12-22  2:49             ` Muchun Song
2020-12-17 12:12 ` [PATCH v10 04/11] mm/hugetlb: Defer freeing of HugeTLB pages Muchun Song
2020-12-21 10:27   ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2020-12-21 11:07     ` [External] " Muchun Song
2020-12-21 14:14       ` Oscar Salvador
2020-12-21 15:18         ` Muchun Song
2020-12-17 12:12 ` [PATCH v10 05/11] mm/hugetlb: Allocate the vmemmap pages associated with each HugeTLB page Muchun Song
2020-12-17 12:12 ` [PATCH v10 06/11] mm/hugetlb: Set the PageHWPoison to the raw error page Muchun Song
2020-12-17 12:12 ` [PATCH v10 07/11] mm/hugetlb: Flush work when dissolving hugetlb page Muchun Song
2020-12-21 10:40   ` Oscar Salvador
2020-12-21 11:07     ` [External] " Muchun Song
2020-12-17 12:13 ` [PATCH v10 08/11] mm/hugetlb: Add a kernel parameter hugetlb_free_vmemmap Muchun Song
2020-12-17 12:13 ` [PATCH v10 09/11] mm/hugetlb: Introduce nr_free_vmemmap_pages in the struct hstate Muchun Song
2020-12-21  8:16   ` Oscar Salvador
2020-12-21  9:33     ` [External] " Muchun Song
2020-12-17 12:13 ` [PATCH v10 10/11] mm/hugetlb: Gather discrete indexes of tail page Muchun Song
2020-12-18  9:06   ` Oscar Salvador
2020-12-18  9:41     ` [External] " Muchun Song
2020-12-17 12:13 ` [PATCH v10 11/11] mm/hugetlb: Optimize the code with the help of the compiler Muchun Song
2020-12-17 12:17 ` [PATCH v10 00/11] Free some vmemmap pages of HugeTLB page David Hildenbrand
2020-12-17 14:59 ` Oscar Salvador
2020-12-17 15:52   ` [External] " Muchun Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201221102703.GA15804@linux \
    --to=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=almasrymina@google.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
    --cc=oneukum@suse.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).