linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, RCU <rcu@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Theodore Y . Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rcu-tasks: add RCU-tasks self tests
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 16:38:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201221153809.GA24756@pc638.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201216232955.GO2657@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>

On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 03:29:55PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 04:49:59PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> > > Add self tests for checking of RCU-tasks API functionality.
> > > It covers:
> > >     - wait API functions;
> > >     - invoking/completion call_rcu_tasks*().
> > > 
> > > Self-tests are run when CONFIG_PROVE_RCU kernel parameter is set.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> > > index 67a162949763..9407772780c1 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> > > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> > > @@ -1225,6 +1225,16 @@ void show_rcu_tasks_gp_kthreads(void)
> > >  }
> > >  #endif /* #ifndef CONFIG_TINY_RCU */
> > >  
> > > +static struct rcu_head rhp;
> > > +static int rcu_execurted_test_counter;
> > > +static int rcu_run_test_counter;
> > > +
> > > +static void test_rcu_tasks_callback(struct rcu_head *r)
> > > +{
> > > +	pr_info("RCU-tasks test callback executed %d\n",
> > > +		++rcu_execurted_test_counter);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  void __init rcu_init_tasks_generic(void)
> > >  {
> > >  #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU
> > > @@ -1238,7 +1248,41 @@ void __init rcu_init_tasks_generic(void)
> > >  #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU
> > >  	rcu_spawn_tasks_trace_kthread();
> > >  #endif
> > > +
> > > +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU)) {
> > > +		pr_info("Running RCU-tasks wait API self tests\n");
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU
> > > +		rcu_run_test_counter++;
> > > +		call_rcu_tasks(&rhp, test_rcu_tasks_callback);
> > > +		synchronize_rcu_tasks();
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RUDE_RCU
> > > +		rcu_run_test_counter++;
> > > +		call_rcu_tasks_trace(&rhp, test_rcu_tasks_callback);
> > > +		synchronize_rcu_tasks_rude();
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU
> > > +		rcu_run_test_counter++;
> > > +		call_rcu_tasks_trace(&rhp, test_rcu_tasks_callback);
> > > +		synchronize_rcu_tasks_trace();
> > > +#endif
> > > +	}
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int rcu_tasks_verify_self_tests(void)
> > > +{
> > > +	int ret = 0;
> > > +
> > > +	if (rcu_run_test_counter != rcu_execurted_test_counter) {
> > > +		WARN_ON(1);
> > > +		ret = -1;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	return ret;
> > >  }
> > > +late_initcall(rcu_tasks_verify_self_tests);
> > >  
> > >  #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU_GENERIC */
> > >  static inline void rcu_tasks_bootup_oddness(void) {}
> > Please find a v2 of the patch that is in question. First version
> > uses the same rhp for all RCU flavors what is wrong. Initially
> > i had three different one per one flavor. But for some reason
> > end up with only one.
> > 
> > 
> > >From e7c6096af5a7916f29c0b4b05e1644b3b3a6c589 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>
> > Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 21:27:32 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] rcu-tasks: Add RCU-tasks self tests
> > 
> > This commit adds self tests for early-boot use of RCU-tasks grace periods.
> > It tests all three variants (Rude, Tasks, and Tasks Trace) and covers
> > both synchronous (e.g., synchronize_rcu_tasks()) and asynchronous (e.g.,
> > call_rcu_tasks()) grace-period APIs.
> > 
> > Self-tests are run only in kernels built with CONFIG_PROVE_RCU=y.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
> 
> Much improved, thank you!  A few more comments below.
> 
> > ---
> >  kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 69 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> > index 36607551f966..7478d912734a 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> > @@ -1224,6 +1224,35 @@ void show_rcu_tasks_gp_kthreads(void)
> >  }
> >  #endif /* #ifndef CONFIG_TINY_RCU */
> > 
> > +struct test_desc {
> 
> Please use something like "struct rcu_tasks_test_desc" to help the poor
> people who might need to grep for this.  Feel free to shorten it, but
> please make it descriptive and thus more likely to stay unique.
> 
> > +       struct rcu_head rh;
> > +       const char *name;
> > +       bool run;
> 
> If you make this "bool notrun" you don't need to initialize.
> 
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct test_desc tests[] = {
> > +       { .name = "call_rcu_tasks()" },
> > +       { .name = "call_rcu_rude()"  },
> > +       { .name = "call_rcu_trace()" },
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int rcu_executed_test_counter;
> > +
> > +static void test_rcu_tasks_callback(struct rcu_head *rhp)
> > +{
> 
> 	struct rcu_tasks_test_desc *rttdp;
> 
> > +       int i;
> > +
> > +       pr_info("RCU-tasks test callback executed %d\n",
> > +               ++rcu_executed_test_counter);
> 
> 	rttdp = container_of(rhp, rh, struct rcu_tasks_test_desc);
> 	rttdp->notrun = true;
> 
> Or I suppose:
> 
> 	container_of(rhp, rh, struct rcu_tasks_test_desc)->notrun = true;
> 
> Then the loop below can go away.
> 
> > +
> > +       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) {
> > +               if (rhp == &tests[i].rh) {
> > +                       tests[i].run = false;
> > +                       break;
> > +               }
> > +       }
> > +}
> > +
> >  void __init rcu_init_tasks_generic(void)
> >  {
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU
> > @@ -1237,7 +1266,47 @@ void __init rcu_init_tasks_generic(void)
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU
> >         rcu_spawn_tasks_trace_kthread();
> >  #endif
> > +
> > +       // Run the self-tests.
> > +       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU)) {
> > +               pr_info("Running RCU-tasks wait API self tests\n");
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU
> > +               tests[0].run = true;
> 
> The s/run/notrun/ allows the three initializations of .run to go away.
> 
> > +               call_rcu_tasks(&tests[0].rh, test_rcu_tasks_callback);
> > +               synchronize_rcu_tasks();
> 
> Why not reverse the order of these two statements?  That would test
> call_rcu_tasks*()'s ability to do a grace period on their own, without
> help from the corresponding synchronize_rcu_tasks*().
> 
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RUDE_RCU
> > +               tests[1].run = true;
> > +               call_rcu_tasks_rude(&tests[1].rh, test_rcu_tasks_callback);
> > +               synchronize_rcu_tasks_rude();
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU
> > +               tests[2].run = true;
> > +               call_rcu_tasks_trace(&tests[2].rh, test_rcu_tasks_callback);
> > +               synchronize_rcu_tasks_trace();
> > +#endif
> > +       }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int rcu_tasks_verify_self_tests(void)
> > +{
> > +       int ret, i;
> 
> Why not initialize "ret" in the declaration?
> 
> > +
> > +       for (i = 0, ret = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) {
> > +               if (tests[i].run) {             // still hanging.
> > +                       pr_err("%s has been failed.\n", tests[i].name);
> > +                       ret = -1;
> > +               }
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       if (ret)
> > +               WARN_ON(1);
> > +
> > +       return ret;
> >  }
> > +late_initcall(rcu_tasks_verify_self_tests);
> > 
> >  #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU_GENERIC */
> >  static inline void rcu_tasks_bootup_oddness(void) {}
> > -- 
> > 2.20.1
> 
> Again, much improved!
> 
See below the v3 version. I hope i fixed all comments :)

From 06f7adfd84cbb1994d0e2693ee9dcdfd272a9bd0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 21:27:32 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/1] rcu-tasks: Add RCU-tasks self tests

This commit adds self tests for early-boot use of RCU-tasks grace periods.
It tests all three variants (Rude, Tasks, and Tasks Trace) and covers
both synchronous (e.g., synchronize_rcu_tasks()) and asynchronous (e.g.,
call_rcu_tasks()) grace-period APIs.

Self-tests are run only in kernels built with CONFIG_PROVE_RCU=y.

Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
index 36607551f966..670212ed9648 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
@@ -1224,6 +1224,43 @@ void show_rcu_tasks_gp_kthreads(void)
 }
 #endif /* #ifndef CONFIG_TINY_RCU */
 
+struct rcu_tasks_test_desc {
+	struct rcu_head rh;
+	const char *name;
+	bool notrun;
+};
+
+static struct rcu_tasks_test_desc tests[] = {
+	{
+		.name = "call_rcu_tasks()",
+		/* If not defined, the test is skipped. */
+		.notrun = !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU),
+	},
+	{
+		.name = "call_rcu_tasks_rude()",
+		/* If not defined, the test is skipped. */
+		.notrun = !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TASKS_RUDE_RCU),
+	},
+	{
+		.name = "call_rcu_tasks_trace()",
+		/* If not defined, the test is skipped. */
+		.notrun = !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU)
+	}
+};
+
+static int rcu_executed_test_counter;
+
+static void test_rcu_tasks_callback(struct rcu_head *rhp)
+{
+	struct rcu_tasks_test_desc *rttd =
+		container_of(rhp, struct rcu_tasks_test_desc, rh);
+
+	pr_info("RCU-tasks test callback executed %d\n",
+		++rcu_executed_test_counter);
+
+	rttd->notrun = true;
+}
+
 void __init rcu_init_tasks_generic(void)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU
@@ -1237,7 +1274,45 @@ void __init rcu_init_tasks_generic(void)
 #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU
 	rcu_spawn_tasks_trace_kthread();
 #endif
+
+	// Run the self-tests.
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU)) {
+		pr_info("Running RCU-tasks wait API self tests\n");
+#ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU
+		synchronize_rcu_tasks();
+		call_rcu_tasks(&tests[0].rh, test_rcu_tasks_callback);
+#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RUDE_RCU
+		synchronize_rcu_tasks_rude();
+		call_rcu_tasks_rude(&tests[1].rh, test_rcu_tasks_callback);
+#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU
+		synchronize_rcu_tasks_trace();
+		call_rcu_tasks_trace(&tests[2].rh, test_rcu_tasks_callback);
+#endif
+	}
+}
+
+static int rcu_tasks_verify_self_tests(void)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) {
+		if (!tests[i].notrun) {		// still hanging.
+			pr_err("%s has been failed.\n", tests[i].name);
+			ret = -1;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (ret)
+		WARN_ON(1);
+
+	return ret;
 }
+late_initcall(rcu_tasks_verify_self_tests);
 
 #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU_GENERIC */
 static inline void rcu_tasks_bootup_oddness(void) {}
-- 
2.20.1

--
Vlad Rezki

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-21 18:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-09 20:27 [PATCH 1/2] rcu-tasks: move RCU-tasks initialization out of core_initcall() Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-12-09 20:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] rcu-tasks: add RCU-tasks self tests Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-12-16 15:49   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-12-16 23:29     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-12-21 15:38       ` Uladzislau Rezki [this message]
2020-12-21 17:18         ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-12-21 18:45           ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-12-21 19:29             ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-12-21 19:48               ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-12-21 20:45                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-12-21 21:28                   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-02-12 19:20   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-02-12 21:12     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-02-12 23:48       ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-02-13  0:37         ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-02-13  0:43           ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-02-13 11:30             ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-02-13 16:45               ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-02-13 20:00                 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-02-15 11:28                 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-02-16 17:30                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-02-17 14:47                     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-02-17 18:17                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-02-18  5:03                         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-02-18  8:36                           ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-02-18 14:29                             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-09 20:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] rcu-tasks: move RCU-tasks initialization out of core_initcall() Uladzislau Rezki
2020-12-10 13:39   ` Daniel Axtens
2020-12-10 17:32     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-12-10 18:17     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-12-10  3:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-12-10 13:04   ` Uladzislau Rezki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201221153809.GA24756@pc638.lan \
    --to=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dja@axtens.net \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).