From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01215C433E6 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 21:40:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEB1E229F0 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 21:40:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726068AbgLUVkg (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Dec 2020 16:40:36 -0500 Received: from relay11.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.231]:55515 "EHLO relay11.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725818AbgLUVkf (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Dec 2020 16:40:35 -0500 Received: from localhost (lfbn-lyo-1-13-140.w86-202.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.202.109.140]) (Authenticated sender: alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com) by relay11.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A652E100004; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 21:39:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 22:39:53 +0100 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Rasmus Villemoes Cc: Alessandro Zummo , Rob Herring , linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: rtc: pcf2127: update bindings Message-ID: <20201221213953.GA3990390@piout.net> References: <20201219013418.3474461-1-alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 21/12/2020 22:17:54+0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > On 19/12/2020 02.34, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > pcf2127, pcf2129 and pca2129 support start-year and reset-source. > > > > No, the 2129 variant doesn't even have a reset output pin. Not sure if > there's any way to reflect that, and it probably doesn't matter, since > nobody's going to add the reset-source property to a 2129 node. But the > commit message is a bit misleading. > Ah sure, I forgot about that., the simplest way is then to not mov pcf/pca2129 out of trivial -- Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com