linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
	Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm: memcg/slab: optimize objcg stock draining
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 20:22:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210106042239.2860107-1-guro@fb.com> (raw)

Imran Khan reported a regression in hackbench results caused by the
commit f2fe7b09a52b ("mm: memcg/slab: charge individual slab objects
instead of pages"). The regression is noticeable in the case of
a consequent allocation of several relatively large slab objects,
e.g. skb's. As soon as the amount of stocked bytes exceeds PAGE_SIZE,
drain_obj_stock() and __memcg_kmem_uncharge() are called, and it leads
to a number of atomic operations in page_counter_uncharge().

The corresponding call graph is below (provided by Imran Khan):
  |__alloc_skb
  |    |
  |    |__kmalloc_reserve.isra.61
  |    |    |
  |    |    |__kmalloc_node_track_caller
  |    |    |    |
  |    |    |    |slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.88
  |    |    |     obj_cgroup_charge
  |    |    |    |    |
  |    |    |    |    |__memcg_kmem_charge
  |    |    |    |    |    |
  |    |    |    |    |    |page_counter_try_charge
  |    |    |    |    |
  |    |    |    |    |refill_obj_stock
  |    |    |    |    |    |
  |    |    |    |    |    |drain_obj_stock.isra.68
  |    |    |    |    |    |    |
  |    |    |    |    |    |    |__memcg_kmem_uncharge
  |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |
  |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |page_counter_uncharge
  |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |
  |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |page_counter_cancel
  |    |    |    |
  |    |    |    |
  |    |    |    |__slab_alloc
  |    |    |    |    |
  |    |    |    |    |___slab_alloc
  |    |    |    |    |
  |    |    |    |slab_post_alloc_hook

Instead of directly uncharging the accounted kernel memory, it's
possible to refill the generic page-sized per-cpu stock instead.
It's a much faster operation, especially on a default hierarchy.
As a bonus, __memcg_kmem_uncharge_page() will also get faster,
so the freeing of page-sized kernel allocations (e.g. large kmallocs)
will become faster.

A similar change has been done earlier for the socket memory by
the commit 475d0487a2ad ("mm: memcontrol: use per-cpu stocks for
socket memory uncharging").

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Reported-by: Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@oracle.com>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 0d74b80fa4de..8148c1df3aff 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -3122,9 +3122,7 @@ void __memcg_kmem_uncharge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
 	if (!cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys))
 		page_counter_uncharge(&memcg->kmem, nr_pages);
 
-	page_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memory, nr_pages);
-	if (do_memsw_account())
-		page_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memsw, nr_pages);
+	refill_stock(memcg, nr_pages);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.26.2


             reply	other threads:[~2021-01-06  4:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-06  4:22 Roman Gushchin [this message]
2021-01-06  6:05 ` [PATCH] mm: memcg/slab: optimize objcg stock draining Shakeel Butt
2021-01-06 16:42   ` Roman Gushchin
2021-01-06  6:19 ` Imran Khan
2021-01-06 19:50 ` Andrew Morton
2021-01-06 20:04   ` Roman Gushchin
2021-01-20 16:34 ` Michal Koutný

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210106042239.2860107-1-guro@fb.com \
    --to=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=imran.f.khan@oracle.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).