From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34B11C433E6 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 08:37:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED0DF22527 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 08:37:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727939AbhAKIg6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 03:36:58 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:49754 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727240AbhAKIg5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 03:36:57 -0500 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 7111E67373; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 09:36:14 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 09:36:14 +0100 From: ". Christoph Hellwig" To: Ricardo Ribalda Cc: ". Christoph Hellwig" , Sergey Senozhatsky , Tomasz Figa , Marek Szyprowski , Robin Murphy , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , IOMMU DRIVERS , Joerg Roedel , Linux Doc Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Media Mailing List , Sergey Senozhatsky Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] media: uvcvideo: Use dma_alloc_noncontiguos API Message-ID: <20210111083614.GA27589@lst.de> References: <20201125221917.150463-1-ribalda@chromium.org> <20201130083410.GD32234@lst.de> <20201201033658.GE3723071@google.com> <20201201144916.GA14682@lst.de> <20201208071320.GA1667627@google.com> <20201209111639.GB22806@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 03:14:08PM +0100, Ricardo Ribalda wrote: > > So I think we do want these branches for coherent vs non-coherent as they > > have very different semantics and I do not think that hiding them under > > the same API helps people to understand those vastly different semantics. > > > > OTOH we should look into a fallback for DMA API instances that do not > > support the discontigous allocations. > > > > I think between your comments and those from Ricardo I have a good idea > > for a somewhat updated API. I'll try to post something in the next days. > > Did you have time to look into this? > > No hurry, I just want to make sure that I didn't miss anything ;) Haven't managed to get to it, sorry. > > Best regards! > > > > -- > Ricardo Ribalda ---end quoted text---