From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E806C433E0 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:45:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E93E225AC for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:45:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388663AbhAKOpH (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 09:45:07 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40842 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728850AbhAKOpH (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 09:45:07 -0500 Received: from ZenIV.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [IPv6:2002:c35c:fd02::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADA47C061794; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 06:44:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from viro by ZenIV.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kyyQ1-009I2g-Bx; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:43:41 +0000 Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:43:41 +0000 From: Al Viro To: David Laight Cc: 'Mikulas Patocka' , Andrew Morton , Dan Williams , Vishal Verma , Dave Jiang , Ira Weiny , Matthew Wilcox , Jan Kara , Steven Whitehouse , Eric Sandeen , Dave Chinner , Theodore Ts'o , Wang Jianchao , "Kani, Toshi" , "Norton, Scott J" , "Tadakamadla, Rajesh" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" Subject: Re: [RFC v2] nvfs: a filesystem for persistent memory Message-ID: <20210111144341.GZ3579531@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20210110162008.GV3579531@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <57dad96341d34822a7943242c9bcad71@AcuMS.aculab.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <57dad96341d34822a7943242c9bcad71@AcuMS.aculab.com> Sender: Al Viro Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 11:57:08AM +0000, David Laight wrote: > > > > size = copy_to_iter(to, ptr, size); > > > > if (unlikely(!size)) { > > > > r = -EFAULT; > > > > goto ret_r; > > > > } > > > > > > > > pos += size; > > > > total += size; > > > > } while (iov_iter_count(to)); > > > > > > That isn't the best formed loop! > > > > > > David > > > > I removed the second "while" statement and fixed the arguments to > > copy_to_iter - other than that, Al's function works. > > The extra while is easy to write and can be difficult to spot. > I've found them looking as the object code before now! That extra while comes from editing cut'n'pasted piece of source while writing a reply. Hint: original had been a do-while. > Oh - the error return for copy_to_iter() is wrong. > It should (probably) return 'total' if it is nonzero. copy_to_iter() call there has an obvious problem (arguments in the wrong order), but return value is handled correctly. It does not do a blind return -EFAULT. RTFS...