From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88599C433DB for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 11:24:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6C2233A1 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 11:24:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727559AbhAMLYN (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:24:13 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:44592 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726908AbhAMLYM (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:24:12 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77B8A2336F; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 11:23:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1610537012; bh=0NYgjzOjhml2lGW631C9LPIJcfCrwDvm/lToJKYk97w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZQggGfq4UfTT6N0VnGCvSlr57fPvQX3aWyYIUSBLbuQN1ynmtCxF8707RmjryVg4i VftYT/t7B9TaAPWH8D47dD5t4RVcFCCoBQY7yGCsB1C8IMtv8pjz/b+t3Jr3u2kg36 EEOh8rAZSBgPENFUATLWdpQNGLYiU8RuSLQBtrz6aAs+m3ETRHRPdK0clYH3kCkCSt bIOs5hpRjqeAVGR3mVD2kTbZg9r17upjwjHr8wUiO16gE6fI/RDRzhEiip/MfjDoqo m9qLMdCswtMDkRIKn6vFmyboWMo4+rfp9eHtVYoIkmtCn0j2YFn4br28KDhhaLfFqF dM1VnzAOYdXhg== Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 13:23:22 +0200 From: Mike Rapoport To: Oscar Salvador Cc: Andrew Morton , Andrea Arcangeli , Baoquan He , Borislav Petkov , David Hildenbrand , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Mel Gorman , Michal Hocko , Mike Rapoport , Qian Cai , Thomas Gleixner , Vlastimil Babka , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/setup: don't remove E820_TYPE_RAM for pfn 0 Message-ID: <20210113112322.GG1106298@kernel.org> References: <20210111194017.22696-1-rppt@kernel.org> <20210111194017.22696-2-rppt@kernel.org> <20210113085644.GA24816@linux> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210113085644.GA24816@linux> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 09:56:49AM +0100, Oscar Salvador wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 09:40:16PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > From: Mike Rapoport > > > > The first 4Kb of memory is a BIOS owned area and to avoid its allocation > > for the kernel it was not listed in e820 tables as memory. As the result, > > pfn 0 was never recognised by the generic memory management and it is not a > > part of neither node 0 nor ZONE_DMA. > > So, since it never was added to memblock.memory structs, it was not > initialized by init_unavailable_mem, right? Actually it was initialized by init_unavailable_mem() and got zone=0 and node=0, but the DMA zone started from pfn 1, so pfn 0 was never a part of ZONE_DMA. > -- > Oscar Salvador > SUSE L3 -- Sincerely yours, Mike.