From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <lkp@lists.01.org>,
<lkp@intel.com>, <ying.huang@intel.com>, <feng.tang@intel.com>,
<zhengjun.xing@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [mm] 10befea91b: hackbench.throughput -62.4% regression
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 19:18:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210114031839.GA415540@carbon.dhcp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210114025151.GA22932@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:51:51AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>
> Greeting,
>
> FYI, we noticed a -62.4% regression of hackbench.throughput due to commit:
Hi!
Commit "mm: memcg/slab: optimize objcg stock draining" (currently only in the mm tree,
so no stable hash) should improve the hackbench regression.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-14 3:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-14 2:51 [mm] 10befea91b: hackbench.throughput -62.4% regression kernel test robot
2021-01-14 3:18 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
[not found] ` <59b6fda7-509a-0afb-112d-46c1e73c589b@intel.com>
2021-02-03 2:49 ` [LKP] " Roman Gushchin
[not found] ` <8ce56447-b416-4750-eeb3-0d5bb92e007d@linux.intel.com>
2021-02-05 1:04 ` Roman Gushchin
2021-02-13 1:22 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-11-26 2:22 ` Rongwei Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210114031839.GA415540@carbon.dhcp.thefacebook.com \
--to=guro@fb.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=zhengjun.xing@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).