From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Md Sadre Alam <mdalam@codeaurora.org>
Cc: manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, richard@nod.at,
vigneshr@ti.com, boris.brezillon@collabora.com,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sricharan@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] mtd: rawnand: qcom: update last code word register
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 16:53:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210114165325.3d510355@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1610251305-20792-1-git-send-email-mdalam@codeaurora.org>
Hello,
Md Sadre Alam <mdalam@codeaurora.org> wrote on Sun, 10 Jan 2021
09:31:45 +0530:
> From QPIC version 2.0 onwards new register got added to
a
> read last codeword. This change will update the same.
the? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Please reword this sentence.
> For first three code word READ_LOCATION_n register will be
> use.For last code word READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_n register will be
> use.
"For the first three codewords, READ_LOCATION_n registers will be used.
The last codeword register will be accessed through
READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_n."
Also, please specify what these registers store.
> Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam <mdalam@codeaurora.org>
Could someone please test this patch?
> ---
> [V3]
> * Added else condition for last code word in update_rw_regs().
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> index 667e4bf..50ff6e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,10 @@
> #define NAND_READ_LOCATION_1 0xf24
> #define NAND_READ_LOCATION_2 0xf28
> #define NAND_READ_LOCATION_3 0xf2c
> +#define NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0 0xf40
> +#define NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_1 0xf44
> +#define NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_2 0xf48
> +#define NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_3 0xf4c
>
> /* dummy register offsets, used by write_reg_dma */
> #define NAND_DEV_CMD1_RESTORE 0xdead
> @@ -187,6 +191,12 @@ nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_##reg, \
> ((size) << READ_LOCATION_SIZE) | \
> ((is_last) << READ_LOCATION_LAST))
>
> +#define nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, reg, offset, size, is_last) \
> +nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_##reg, \
> + ((offset) << READ_LOCATION_OFFSET) | \
> + ((size) << READ_LOCATION_SIZE) | \
> + ((is_last) << READ_LOCATION_LAST))
> +
> /*
> * Returns the actual register address for all NAND_DEV_ registers
> * (i.e. NAND_DEV_CMD0, NAND_DEV_CMD1, NAND_DEV_CMD2 and NAND_DEV_CMD_VLD)
> @@ -316,6 +326,10 @@ struct nandc_regs {
> __le32 read_location1;
> __le32 read_location2;
> __le32 read_location3;
> + __le32 read_location_last0;
> + __le32 read_location_last1;
> + __le32 read_location_last2;
> + __le32 read_location_last3;
>
> __le32 erased_cw_detect_cfg_clr;
> __le32 erased_cw_detect_cfg_set;
> @@ -644,6 +658,14 @@ static __le32 *offset_to_nandc_reg(struct nandc_regs *regs, int offset)
> return ®s->read_location2;
> case NAND_READ_LOCATION_3:
> return ®s->read_location3;
> + case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0:
> + return ®s->read_location_last0;
> + case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_1:
> + return ®s->read_location_last1;
> + case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_2:
> + return ®s->read_location_last2;
> + case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_3:
> + return ®s->read_location_last3;
> default:
> return NULL;
> }
> @@ -719,9 +741,14 @@ static void update_rw_regs(struct qcom_nand_host *host, int num_cw, bool read)
> nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_READ_STATUS, host->clrreadstatus);
> nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_EXEC_CMD, 1);
>
> - if (read)
> - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, host->use_ecc ?
> - host->cw_data : host->cw_size, 1);
> + if (read) {
> + if (nandc->props->qpic_v2)
> + nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 0, 0, host->use_ecc ?
> + host->cw_data : host->cw_size, 1);
> + else
> + nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, host->use_ecc ?
> + host->cw_data : host->cw_size, 1);
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1096,9 +1123,13 @@ static void config_nand_page_read(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc)
> static void
> config_nand_cw_read(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc, bool use_ecc)
> {
> - if (nandc->props->is_bam)
> + if (nandc->props->is_bam) {
> + if (nandc->props->qpic_v2)
> + write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0,
> + 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
> write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_0, 4,
> NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
> + }
>
> write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_FLASH_CMD, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
> write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_EXEC_CMD, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
> @@ -1633,16 +1664,28 @@ qcom_nandc_read_cw_raw(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
> }
>
> if (nandc->props->is_bam) {
> - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, read_loc, data_size1, 0);
> + if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1))
> + nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 0, read_loc, data_size1, 0);
> + else
> + nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, read_loc, data_size1, 0);
You repeat many times this logic, a helper to avoid this extra
indentation level with the if/else block is needed.
> read_loc += data_size1;
>
> - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 1, read_loc, oob_size1, 0);
> + if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1))
> + nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 1, read_loc, oob_size1, 0);
> + else
> + nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 1, read_loc, oob_size1, 0);
> read_loc += oob_size1;
>
> - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 2, read_loc, data_size2, 0);
> + if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1))
> + nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 2, read_loc, data_size2, 0);
> + else
> + nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 2, read_loc, data_size2, 0);
> read_loc += data_size2;
>
> - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 3, read_loc, oob_size2, 1);
> + if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1))
> + nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 3, read_loc, oob_size2, 0);
> + else
> + nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 3, read_loc, oob_size2, 1);
> }
Thanks,
Miquèl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-14 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-10 4:01 [PATCH V3] mtd: rawnand: qcom: update last code word register Md Sadre Alam
2021-01-14 15:53 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2021-01-14 16:31 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-01-14 16:42 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-01-28 21:48 ` mdalam
2021-01-28 22:11 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-01-29 5:05 ` mdalam
2021-01-28 7:52 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-01-29 5:11 ` mdalam
2021-02-05 17:53 ` mdalam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210114165325.3d510355@xps13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=mdalam@codeaurora.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=sricharan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).