From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc: Handle .text.{hot,unlikely}.* in linker script
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 12:44:38 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210116184438.GE30983@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210104205952.1399409-1-natechancellor@gmail.com>
Hi!
Very late of course, and the patch is fine, but:
On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 01:59:53PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> Commit eff8728fe698 ("vmlinux.lds.h: Add PGO and AutoFDO input
> sections") added ".text.unlikely.*" and ".text.hot.*" due to an LLVM
> change [1].
>
> After another LLVM change [2], these sections are seen in some PowerPC
> builds, where there is a orphan section warning then build failure:
>
> $ make -skj"$(nproc)" \
> ARCH=powerpc CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64le-linux-gnu- LLVM=1 O=out \
> distclean powernv_defconfig zImage.epapr
> ld.lld: warning: kernel/built-in.a(panic.o):(.text.unlikely.) is being placed in '.text.unlikely.'
Is the section really called ".text.unlikely.", i.e. the name ending in
a dot? How very unusual, is there some bug elsewhere?
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-16 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-04 20:48 [PATCH] powerpc: Handle .text.{hot,unlikely}.* in linker script Nathan Chancellor
2021-01-04 20:55 ` Sedat Dilek
2021-01-04 20:57 ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-01-04 20:59 ` [PATCH v2] " Nathan Chancellor
2021-01-15 12:23 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-01-16 18:44 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2021-01-16 18:52 ` Nathan Chancellor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210116184438.GE30983@gate.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).