From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6466BC433DB for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 11:28:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2900420758 for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 11:28:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728544AbhAQL2f (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Jan 2021 06:28:35 -0500 Received: from www.zeus03.de ([194.117.254.33]:38468 "EHLO mail.zeus03.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728149AbhAQL2U (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Jan 2021 06:28:20 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=sang-engineering.com; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=EuAcIGM5UpaqNlEQP9NTkc9HxhbR /sTXIcTuq3b2I7c=; b=Zo78i2u9ZF+Fo5YhbPErZYbfHbEJB+pDHpy/jlEXi521 izXDPr/DHHpsslDusiBJgj7kxysBxwxZsEPBPJgufZPdVTiinfNSALGaxgFvbu83 pRjx4peZjVLz35xDGFpSfijl/WeaWifE/644Wj2Fbguz1mSoqTASERLhF7gSNfE= Received: (qmail 301521 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2021 12:27:35 +0100 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with ESMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 17 Jan 2021 12:27:35 +0100 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@tK1d5Ba5fJkgAwDPXy7qAHeYPdzlZkhM Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2021 12:27:35 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Robert Richter , Jan Glauber , David Daney , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] i2c: octeon: check correct size of maximum RECV_LEN packet Message-ID: <20210117112735.GD1983@ninjato> References: <20210109124314.27466-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <20210109124314.27466-5-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Hf61M2y+wYpnELGG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210109124314.27466-5-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Hf61M2y+wYpnELGG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 01:43:08PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX defines already the maximum number as defined in the > SMBus 2.0 specs. No reason to add one to it. >=20 > Fixes: 886f6f8337dd ("i2c: octeon: Support I2C_M_RECV_LEN") > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang Applied to for-current, thanks! --Hf61M2y+wYpnELGG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmAEHycACgkQFA3kzBSg KbY2ohAAp/hyssOPhPf3OI/RB21Oy1wD1tgMlneSN2fgkqWW462s//YHlYebmNBq vK2VAK+JH3UCHwmVF8IyaCmPtBi7hdtFwR/xyf4Zh4zijH9Rtl4rqpfvdX/zWw0o dGmJ5Ffy6U91qvfWjUq6P+SwtApL27PTgV7eVXz3uR70rihPyDL09wPqzD6dEnT1 pet14ry5r1yA+i674vaQQpPQsJJh86i5DxcH2oCWnGAZP8GSx7lBXqG8YBiN2Ph2 Dkp4IF2z+xHIxO27+4FB/p8rQGGqZmKZLHooI2scKuVZAu1faxWCkUSUrxfbStZ0 0DZj6cV0W/ggCS3kQogRyGnTpcJIvdZQsKvTerL8UborlNpcDGqyMUm0edbbsShT KshchzdEv1VlxasElZHaTegyijJmX0b6dTA278orxgqxEWm6iXu6VsNJCyLw1kt9 3AxdJMGG3yqSXwRdXSyK4tznwoLlH+20Hg5L1sDGdu558naDuwoPlfUS2BkZzkq7 SkFt7wL4jwNy/HKIxD++7TOR246z9k7uRz08vgn3OK1masBX+9wZyjKRn4lQfamE mb8r5/8L21jchBfcqgYOFPDA8Q8DCSDHkX2q+0u/Ldox4rqcTXevkkrzHDAKRRZW 4Nwi0u62slT2pvIr4llGpL3NMZz3NyGpSMevchq5E9p6C30NXyo= =wLIN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Hf61M2y+wYpnELGG--