From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CAEDC433E0 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 03:49:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD83722BF3 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 03:49:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726884AbhAYDtI (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Jan 2021 22:49:08 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48374 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726707AbhAYDtD (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Jan 2021 22:49:03 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-x22b.google.com (mail-oi1-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 931CEC061573 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 19:48:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oi1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id g69so12606904oib.12 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 19:48:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=4a5tIooMtDv6SEF5S8JWRuXD5tSGj5nomhEoxl5xxAI=; b=OqiLSnfu+tQexnWWZ8goPT//Wha9q1odHy9SG8B2EbmvN4OOAyT4nYYrsmdu5XUP6i YhsOIUt9azUt1ngiybqOELwzk8nyDQTG1tDT1Ho97HdfjWzhy7DftXaRgltJFARrI3iH FucRaYCXljbOHafpJstBfiv6t1YH/Lox73Gxh29P2xA6Zh7s/F4THxi2nLZ7xarpV6FJ 6Y+WznhANn8wY8CqopcbfwJkE2GpP1fcuucuECFqBTyQyvjfoa3CMEUfhAFy047Z4mmp ARWz+LHL/U8Ic2RF24oz+5KMo49x3r2Z1bACpCg072BIjSoQ1t1U4HGlKoHHK5JCwNfb 7dFw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=4a5tIooMtDv6SEF5S8JWRuXD5tSGj5nomhEoxl5xxAI=; b=d/45fB2Jr1Lo1Ob8pk9IAabTZCH9TmsfdkvkWx2xGANgRU2gO7GkyqPzp4GhcxHrcQ 8Gb1UFJYaLmQgKUMumeJqItLvkZYSKbOuU4Y1rIWCCcr6Ts3gqwiLHcq/sHbgM6CGWQw TcezVQZQdFmH+SHy6tHeyMtW/jQ0RF/YhrVvHbszBbA9zkXn1jzrem+zvAtSaODAhG5e Yw8BfN76Q6/NdRPlLVsKmj3XEe5pT+0GhPje0Wi6lGXZ/IjzNc8oaR8isyzNCIi+/Mzh wPcb52uOD1GeqLqhuRynflpUFf2dDBpbG5k7u31dP2cgoLQtvtaOM52beDCYslSHFmWa /Ccw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533IoMQ3NHx/rp3FaAm0xFVZ/Gu7HSHUjUpYAGNl/ogsUcQJPzN5 i2DNBUuwhUEl2VOiNFZaqZkAHg1BbUM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzcQMDfQHGPqJ/RgMNNO3VA8m+v15OrrPuwhd1dkqShv58/L+TZr9RCbKjMI1b6+dnIps8YUA== X-Received: by 2002:aca:620a:: with SMTP id w10mr25005oib.66.1611546501896; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 19:48:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w11sm3283359otl.13.2021.01.24.19.48.20 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 24 Jan 2021 19:48:21 -0800 (PST) Sender: Guenter Roeck Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2021 19:48:19 -0800 From: Guenter Roeck To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 5.11-rc5 Message-ID: <20210125034819.GA163132@roeck-us.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 05:06:40PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > So this rc looked fairly calm and small, all the way up until today. > > In fact, over 40% of the non-merge commits came in today, as people > unloaded their work for the week on me. The end result is a slightly > larger than usual rc5 (but both 5.10 and 5.8 were bigger, so not some > kind of odd outlier). > > Nothing particularly stands out. We had a couple of splice() > regressions that came in during the previous release as part of the > "get rid of set_fs()" development, but they were for odd cases that > most people would never notice. I think it's just that 5.10 is now > getting more widely deployed so people see the fallout from that > rather fundamental change in the last release. And the only reason I > even reacted to those is just because I ended up being involved with > some of the tty patches during the early calm period of the past week. > There's a few more still pending. > > But the bulk of it all is all the usual miscellaneous fixes all over > the place, and a lot of it is truly trivial one- or few-liners. Just > under half the patch is for drivers, with the rest being the usual mix > of tooling, arch updates, filesystem and core (mm, scheduling, > networking). > > Nothing here makes me go "Uhhuh" in other words. > Looking pretty good now. Build results: total: 153 pass: 153 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 430 pass: 430 fail: 0 Guenter