linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Jianlin Lv <Jianlin.Lv@arm.com>
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@redhat.com, mhiramat@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tracing: precise log info for kretprobe addr err
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 19:19:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210125181926.GA10248@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210125160108.2147511-1-Jianlin.Lv@arm.com>

On 01/26, Jianlin Lv wrote:
>
> When trying to create kretprobe with the wrong function symbol in tracefs;
> The error is triggered in the register_trace_kprobe() and recorded as
> FAIL_REG_PROBE issue,
>
> Example:
>   $ cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing
>   $ echo 'r:myprobe ERROR_SYMBOL_XXX ret=%x0' >> kprobe_events
>     bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
>   $ cat error_log
>     [142797.347877] trace_kprobe: error: Failed to register probe event
>     Command: r:myprobe ERROR_SYMBOL_XXX ret=%x0
>                        ^
>
> This error can be detected in the parameter parsing stage, the effect of
> applying this patch is as follows:
>
>   $ echo 'r:myprobe ERROR_SYMBOL_XXX ret=%x0' >> kprobe_events
>     bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
>   $ cat error_log
>     [415.89]trace_kprobe: error: Retprobe address must be an function entry
>     Command: r:myprobe ERROR_SYMBOL_XXX ret=%x0

IOW, the "offset != 0" check removed by this patch is obviously wrong, right?

Agreed, but...

> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ static int trace_kprobe_create(int argc, const char *argv[])
>  			flags |= TPARG_FL_RETURN;
>  		if (kprobe_on_func_entry(NULL, symbol, offset))
>  			flags |= TPARG_FL_FENTRY;
> -		if (offset && is_return && !(flags & TPARG_FL_FENTRY)) {
> +		if (!strchr(symbol, ':') && is_return && !(flags & TPARG_FL_FENTRY)) {

but why did you add the strchr(':') check instead?

I was really puzzled until I found the this email from Masami:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210120131406.5a992c1e434681750a0cd5d4@kernel.org/

So I leave this to you and Masami, but perhaps you can document this check at
least in the changelog?

Oleg.


  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-25 18:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-25 16:01 [PATCH v3] tracing: precise log info for kretprobe addr err Jianlin Lv
2021-01-25 18:19 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2021-01-25 18:38   ` Steven Rostedt
2021-01-26  4:15     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-01-26 10:02       ` Jianlin Lv
2021-01-26 20:20       ` Oleg Nesterov
2021-01-26 20:43         ` Steven Rostedt
2021-01-26 21:17           ` Oleg Nesterov
2021-01-26 21:40             ` Steven Rostedt
2021-01-27  2:14               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-01-27  2:02         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-01-27  2:46           ` Jianlin Lv
2021-01-27 13:27             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-01-27 14:25               ` Jianlin Lv

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210125181926.GA10248@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=Jianlin.Lv@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).