From: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH BUGFIX/IMPROVEMENT 4/6] block, bfq: fix weight-raising resume with !low_latency
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 11:51:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210126105102.53102-5-paolo.valente@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210126105102.53102-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org>
When the io_latency heuristic is off, bfq_queues must not start to be
weight-raised. Unfortunately, by mistake, this may happen when the
state of a previously weight-raised bfq_queue is resumed after a queue
split. This commit fixes this error.
Tested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
---
block/bfq-iosched.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index c5bda33c0923..0c7e203085f1 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -1010,7 +1010,7 @@ static void
bfq_bfqq_resume_state(struct bfq_queue *bfqq, struct bfq_data *bfqd,
struct bfq_io_cq *bic, bool bfq_already_existing)
{
- unsigned int old_wr_coeff = bfqq->wr_coeff;
+ unsigned int old_wr_coeff = 1;
bool busy = bfq_already_existing && bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq);
if (bic->saved_has_short_ttime)
@@ -1031,7 +1031,13 @@ bfq_bfqq_resume_state(struct bfq_queue *bfqq, struct bfq_data *bfqd,
bfqq->ttime = bic->saved_ttime;
bfqq->io_start_time = bic->saved_io_start_time;
bfqq->tot_idle_time = bic->saved_tot_idle_time;
- bfqq->wr_coeff = bic->saved_wr_coeff;
+ /*
+ * Restore weight coefficient only if low_latency is on
+ */
+ if (bfqd->low_latency) {
+ old_wr_coeff = bfqq->wr_coeff;
+ bfqq->wr_coeff = bic->saved_wr_coeff;
+ }
bfqq->service_from_wr = bic->saved_service_from_wr;
bfqq->wr_start_at_switch_to_srt = bic->saved_wr_start_at_switch_to_srt;
bfqq->last_wr_start_finish = bic->saved_last_wr_start_finish;
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-26 11:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-26 10:50 [PATCH BUGFIX/IMPROVEMENT 0/6] block, bfq: third and last batch of fixes and improvements Paolo Valente
2021-01-26 10:50 ` [PATCH BUGFIX/IMPROVEMENT 1/6] block, bfq: always inject I/O of queues blocked by wakers Paolo Valente
2021-01-26 16:17 ` Jens Axboe
2021-02-25 15:58 ` Paolo Valente
2021-01-26 10:50 ` [PATCH BUGFIX/IMPROVEMENT 2/6] block, bfq: put reqs of waker and woken in dispatch list Paolo Valente
2021-01-26 16:18 ` Jens Axboe
2021-01-28 17:54 ` Paolo Valente
2021-02-03 11:01 ` Paolo Valente
2021-02-03 11:43 ` Jan Kara
2021-02-05 10:16 ` Paolo Valente
2021-02-09 17:09 ` Paolo Valente
2021-01-26 10:50 ` [PATCH BUGFIX/IMPROVEMENT 3/6] block, bfq: make shared queues inherit wakers Paolo Valente
2021-01-26 10:51 ` Paolo Valente [this message]
2021-01-26 10:51 ` [PATCH BUGFIX/IMPROVEMENT 5/6] block, bfq: keep shared queues out of the waker mechanism Paolo Valente
2021-02-03 11:48 ` Jan Kara
2021-01-26 10:51 ` [PATCH BUGFIX/IMPROVEMENT 6/6] block, bfq: merge bursts of newly-created queues Paolo Valente
2021-01-26 16:15 ` Jens Axboe
2021-02-25 17:25 ` Paolo Valente
2021-01-27 7:34 ` kernel test robot
2021-01-27 9:52 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210126105102.53102-5-paolo.valente@linaro.org \
--to=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).