From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A6EDC433DB for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 14:57:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40658230FD for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 14:57:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390170AbhAZO5N (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2021 09:57:13 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51272 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2391482AbhAZO4e (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2021 09:56:34 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42E88C061A29; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 06:55:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=AfVmvy0+ars8vSXgUaa4Ou66AyTq8tua1GFfd4k4JEw=; b=nAP0nDbV1kwONwbXFxyftiqDWQ jHiVYK1NDKnF8QM69l3dG2FMsAL3iwGEI4VIpsVWD8NwGnDS/qwfGpm/s7IvdCmdZxN6z0NBOUOMX YsXcAxL04Ph78LoBwNMMvjI8JoSKao4Y2A92kUpREHLGb8TP6wqGFn4Z5Qa6E4pplksDWHdn/YL/T u1awwBPfVKq2MKlAnFFBbUPwFq/kxETbl3BSIto9xDeIvrQZNrjdM6PseQVL1Nu+JuoDOKC4BRjze R1vY4iXhTAIC177ONzK6Rj9jUVuhpyOkmi7Bw4tq7Ewm0jKEb9qOFULDXkvUQhNufow0/F7nS9cKe A0rXnu7Q==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l4Pe2-005lWp-2r; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 14:48:57 +0000 Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 14:48:38 +0000 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Mike Rapoport Cc: Michal Hocko , Andrew Morton , Alexander Viro , Andy Lutomirski , Arnd Bergmann , Borislav Petkov , Catalin Marinas , Christopher Lameter , Dan Williams , Dave Hansen , David Hildenbrand , Elena Reshetova , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , James Bottomley , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Mark Rutland , Mike Rapoport , Michael Kerrisk , Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Walmsley , Peter Zijlstra , Rick Edgecombe , Roman Gushchin , Shakeel Butt , Shuah Khan , Thomas Gleixner , Tycho Andersen , Will Deacon , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org, Hagen Paul Pfeifer , Palmer Dabbelt Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 08/11] secretmem: add memcg accounting Message-ID: <20210126144838.GL308988@casper.infradead.org> References: <20210121122723.3446-1-rppt@kernel.org> <20210121122723.3446-9-rppt@kernel.org> <20210125165451.GT827@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20210125213817.GM6332@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210125213817.GM6332@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 11:38:17PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote: > I cannot use __GFP_ACCOUNT because cma_alloc() does not use gfp. > Besides, kmem accounting with __GFP_ACCOUNT does not seem > to update stats and there was an explicit request for statistics: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CALo0P13aq3GsONnZrksZNU9RtfhMsZXGWhK1n=xYJWQizCd4Zw@mail.gmail.com/ > > As for (ab)using NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B, as it was already discussed here: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201129172625.GD557259@kernel.org/ > > I think that a dedicated stats counter would be too much at the moment and > NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B is the only explicit stat for unreclaimable memory. That's not true -- Mlocked is also unreclaimable. And doesn't this feel more like mlocked memory than unreclaimable slab? It's also Unevictable, so could be counted there instead.