From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Fix kernel address detection of __is_lm_address()
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 16:36:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210126163638.GA3509@gaia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210126134056.45747-1-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 01:40:56PM +0000, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
> Currently, the __is_lm_address() check just masks out the top 12 bits
> of the address, but if they are 0, it still yields a true result.
> This has as a side effect that virt_addr_valid() returns true even for
> invalid virtual addresses (e.g. 0x0).
>
> Fix the detection checking that it's actually a kernel address starting
> at PAGE_OFFSET.
>
> Fixes: f4693c2716b35 ("arm64: mm: extend linear region for 52-bit VA configurations")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4.x
Not sure what happened with the Fixes tag but that's definitely not what
it fixes. The above is a 5.11 commit that preserves the semantics of an
older commit. So it should be:
Fixes: 68dd8ef32162 ("arm64: memory: Fix virt_addr_valid() using __is_lm_address()")
The above also had a fix for another commit but no need to add two
entries, we just fix the original fix: 14c127c957c1 ("arm64: mm: Flip
kernel VA space").
Anyway, no need to repost, I can update the fixes tag myself.
In terms of stable backports, it may be cleaner to backport 7bc1a0f9e176
("arm64: mm: use single quantity to represent the PA to VA translation")
which has a Fixes tag already but never made it to -stable. On top of
this, we can backport Ard's latest f4693c2716b35 ("arm64: mm: extend
linear region for 52-bit VA configurations"). I just tried these locally
and the conflicts were fairly trivial.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-26 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-26 13:40 [PATCH] arm64: Fix kernel address detection of __is_lm_address() Vincenzo Frascino
2021-01-26 16:36 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2021-01-26 18:37 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-01-27 13:09 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210126163638.GA3509@gaia \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).