linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Subject: [PATCH 03/16] rcu/nocb: Forbid NOCB toggling on offline CPUs
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 18:12:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210128171222.131380-4-frederic@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210128171222.131380-1-frederic@kernel.org>

Toggling the NOCB state of a CPU when it is offline imply some specific
issues to handle, especially making sure that the kthreads have handled
all the remaining callbacks and bypass before the corresponding CPU can
be set as non-offloaded while it is offline.

To prevent from such complications, simply forbid offline CPUs to
perform NOCB-mode toggling. It's a simple rule to observe and after all
it doesn't make much sense to switch a non working CPU to/from offloaded
state.

Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c        |  3 +--
 kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 57 +++++++++++++++-------------------------
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index e7a226abff0d..4c5a1ac54fa6 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -4068,8 +4068,7 @@ int rcutree_prepare_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
 	raw_spin_unlock_rcu_node(rnp);		/* irqs remain disabled. */
 	/*
 	 * Lock in case the CB/GP kthreads are still around handling
-	 * old callbacks (longer term we should flush all callbacks
-	 * before completing CPU offline)
+	 * old callbacks.
 	 */
 	rcu_nocb_lock(rdp);
 	if (rcu_segcblist_empty(&rdp->cblist)) /* No early-boot CBs? */
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index dcfae03eb9e9..732942a15f2b 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -2399,23 +2399,18 @@ static int rdp_offload_toggle(struct rcu_data *rdp,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int __rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload(struct rcu_data *rdp)
+static long rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload(void *arg)
 {
+	struct rcu_data *rdp = arg;
 	struct rcu_segcblist *cblist = &rdp->cblist;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int ret;
 
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(rdp->cpu != raw_smp_processor_id());
+
 	pr_info("De-offloading %d\n", rdp->cpu);
 
 	rcu_nocb_lock_irqsave(rdp, flags);
-	/*
-	 * If there are still pending work offloaded, the offline
-	 * CPU won't help much handling them.
-	 */
-	if (cpu_is_offline(rdp->cpu) && !rcu_segcblist_empty(&rdp->cblist)) {
-		rcu_nocb_unlock_irqrestore(rdp, flags);
-		return -EBUSY;
-	}
 
 	ret = rdp_offload_toggle(rdp, false, flags);
 	swait_event_exclusive(rdp->nocb_state_wq,
@@ -2446,14 +2441,6 @@ static int __rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload(struct rcu_data *rdp)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static long rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload(void *arg)
-{
-	struct rcu_data *rdp = arg;
-
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(rdp->cpu != raw_smp_processor_id());
-	return __rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload(rdp);
-}
-
 int rcu_nocb_cpu_deoffload(int cpu)
 {
 	struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
@@ -2466,12 +2453,14 @@ int rcu_nocb_cpu_deoffload(int cpu)
 	mutex_lock(&rcu_state.barrier_mutex);
 	cpus_read_lock();
 	if (rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(rdp)) {
-		if (cpu_online(cpu))
+		if (cpu_online(cpu)) {
 			ret = work_on_cpu(cpu, rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload, rdp);
-		else
-			ret = __rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload(rdp);
-		if (!ret)
-			cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, rcu_nocb_mask);
+			if (!ret)
+				cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, rcu_nocb_mask);
+		} else {
+			pr_info("NOCB: Can't CB-deoffload an offline CPU\n");
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+		}
 	}
 	cpus_read_unlock();
 	mutex_unlock(&rcu_state.barrier_mutex);
@@ -2480,12 +2469,14 @@ int rcu_nocb_cpu_deoffload(int cpu)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_nocb_cpu_deoffload);
 
-static int __rcu_nocb_rdp_offload(struct rcu_data *rdp)
+static long rcu_nocb_rdp_offload(void *arg)
 {
+	struct rcu_data *rdp = arg;
 	struct rcu_segcblist *cblist = &rdp->cblist;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int ret;
 
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(rdp->cpu != raw_smp_processor_id());
 	/*
 	 * For now we only support re-offload, ie: the rdp must have been
 	 * offloaded on boot first.
@@ -2525,14 +2516,6 @@ static int __rcu_nocb_rdp_offload(struct rcu_data *rdp)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static long rcu_nocb_rdp_offload(void *arg)
-{
-	struct rcu_data *rdp = arg;
-
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(rdp->cpu != raw_smp_processor_id());
-	return __rcu_nocb_rdp_offload(rdp);
-}
-
 int rcu_nocb_cpu_offload(int cpu)
 {
 	struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
@@ -2541,12 +2524,14 @@ int rcu_nocb_cpu_offload(int cpu)
 	mutex_lock(&rcu_state.barrier_mutex);
 	cpus_read_lock();
 	if (!rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(rdp)) {
-		if (cpu_online(cpu))
+		if (cpu_online(cpu)) {
 			ret = work_on_cpu(cpu, rcu_nocb_rdp_offload, rdp);
-		else
-			ret = __rcu_nocb_rdp_offload(rdp);
-		if (!ret)
-			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, rcu_nocb_mask);
+			if (!ret)
+				cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, rcu_nocb_mask);
+		} else {
+			pr_info("NOCB: Can't CB-offload an offline CPU\n");
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+		}
 	}
 	cpus_read_unlock();
 	mutex_unlock(&rcu_state.barrier_mutex);
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-28 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-28 17:12 [PATCH 00/16] rcu/nocb updates Frederic Weisbecker
2021-01-28 17:12 ` [PATCH 01/16] rcu/nocb: Fix potential missed nocb_timer rearm Frederic Weisbecker
     [not found]   ` <20210128184834.GP2743@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
2021-01-28 21:23     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-01-28 17:12 ` [PATCH 02/16] rcu/nocb: Comment the reason behind BH disablement on batch processing Frederic Weisbecker
2021-01-28 17:12 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2021-01-28 19:52   ` [PATCH 03/16] rcu/nocb: Forbid NOCB toggling on offline CPUs Paul E. McKenney
2021-01-28 17:12 ` [PATCH 04/16] rcu/nocb: Only (re-)initialize segcblist when needed on CPU up Frederic Weisbecker
     [not found]   ` <20210128191228.GQ2743@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
2021-01-28 21:34     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-01-28 21:45       ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-01-29  0:26         ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-01-28 17:12 ` [PATCH 05/16] rcu/nocb: Disable bypass when CPU isn't completely offloaded Frederic Weisbecker
2021-01-28 21:31   ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-01-28 22:25     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-01-29  0:19       ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-01-28 17:12 ` [PATCH 06/16] rcu/nocb: Avoid confusing double write of rdp->nocb_cb_sleep Frederic Weisbecker
2021-01-28 21:42   ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-01-28 17:12 ` [PATCH 07/16] rcu/nocb: Rename nocb_gp_update_state to nocb_gp_update_state_deoffloading Frederic Weisbecker
2021-01-29  0:49   ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-01-28 17:12 ` [PATCH 08/16] rcu/nocb: Move trace_rcu_nocb_wake() calls outside nocb_lock when possible Frederic Weisbecker
2021-01-29  0:51   ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-01-28 17:12 ` [PATCH 09/16] rcu/nocb: Merge nocb_timer to the rdp leader Frederic Weisbecker
2021-01-28 17:12 ` [PATCH 10/16] rcu/nocb: Directly call __wake_nocb_gp() from bypass timer Frederic Weisbecker
2021-01-28 17:12 ` [PATCH 11/16] rcu/nocb: Allow de-offloading rdp leader Frederic Weisbecker
2021-01-28 17:12 ` [PATCH 12/16] rcu/nocb: Cancel nocb_timer upon nocb_gp wakeup Frederic Weisbecker
2021-01-28 17:12 ` [PATCH 13/16] rcu/nocb: Delete bypass_timer " Frederic Weisbecker
2021-01-28 17:12 ` [PATCH 14/16] rcu/nocb: Only cancel nocb timer if not polling Frederic Weisbecker
2021-01-28 17:12 ` [PATCH 15/16] rcu/nocb: Prepare for finegrained deferred wakeup Frederic Weisbecker
2021-01-28 17:12 ` [PATCH 16/16] rcu/nocb: Unify timers Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210128171222.131380-4-frederic@kernel.org \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).