From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E788C433E6 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 22:31:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50AAC64DEF for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 22:31:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231432AbhA1WbL (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 17:31:11 -0500 Received: from hmm.wantstofly.org ([213.239.204.108]:50768 "EHLO mail.wantstofly.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229774AbhA1WbG (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 17:31:06 -0500 Received: by mail.wantstofly.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 129A07F45D; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:30:20 +0200 (EET) Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:30:20 +0200 From: Lennert Buytenhek To: Jens Axboe Cc: Matthew Wilcox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] io_uring: add support for IORING_OP_GETDENTS64 Message-ID: <20210128223020.GG186627@wantstofly.org> References: <20210123114152.GA120281@wantstofly.org> <20210123232754.GA308988@casper.infradead.org> <39a9b1da-bbcc-daa0-12e9-3eb776658564@kernel.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <39a9b1da-bbcc-daa0-12e9-3eb776658564@kernel.dk> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 04:33:34PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > >> IORING_OP_GETDENTS64 behaves like getdents64(2) and takes the same > > > > Could we drop the '64'? We don't, for example, have IOURING_OP_FADVISE64 > > even though that's the name of the syscall. > > Agreed, only case we do mimic the names are for things like > IORING_OP_OPENAT2 where it does carry meaning. For this one, it should > just be IORING_OP_GETDENTS. OK, I've made this change.