From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F81C433DB for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2021 10:09:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 696E660233 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2021 10:09:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232036AbhA3KJl (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jan 2021 05:09:41 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49792 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231543AbhA3CJw (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jan 2021 21:09:52 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x633.google.com (mail-ej1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::633]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EE31C0613ED; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 18:09:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x633.google.com with SMTP id by1so15701525ejc.0; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 18:09:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=MU9ukK+giuaa3vu2E7Y8gSnqk8uNjtWUT/IiFfJuCvg=; b=XO1gGsWSECIsiMXBzGrrArDzAsM9KTkefej8iUINdq93tWd4bgtKe+Y3vsozz9KdcM HgxJ1A+g9vJC/53WkdpRusTcShYlGcWhVNI24VkfL8LHb7HHSEGMh5fd/EJlDOSLQm9T 5l5Nsejwm+VEXj9fhiLjkaOCvzpjUCUKLVF4/iF9HrHxWdXhaoyjHH7bYJVfMIv5kdj0 NmqdcEPB/wcWKf4+kimiKdfoimfmVQ7uSuHjEiP9cHI5jS2diIKlSuGGjc4YSSLU5kmY eDghgrPVfLuzK19lCwYfZVtRMhqxHF0i6/LeF6HHms8FgdKUvE69dnbGIdmqfTjWXrWm VDgQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=MU9ukK+giuaa3vu2E7Y8gSnqk8uNjtWUT/IiFfJuCvg=; b=dkTuQ/7jvnoNpvGiaNGicZHIRH6EUqmhIJeQiSHjvjLHPO4ZGnDj0q7ntBJJjEJaQF OXdrDFYAhjT485yBPECfX/LEjaukQ3Tc+Jd8ACa/tbhrFsovtf/TxzYbvXZjnzXb2PAZ H7d/cJqUiQGo4zmvv7kYgBckEkOyrQJ36Ds9hayHiZh7qcwl2ed7JUjaEYEaM09qq+lN YKw2z9enlxLj1BoS1HizSWUJieQ/2ABN9dVH1QLPxDtxgPFBN4kiD+v1g6Du94lZ7iBR J5IH7ARG55UKr1nJ3WX5IhEup7QNdohOPRih0rLlfetrZ3AKulH2tyTM9RDjJkp6BkRB gS7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531wAScaEoVSdglyInOjqg7mxfgc9GBrlXFe5TsVhh41GKt0F0Q2 ImB1ZHT9hzIWsoORZx2rXc4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx88NB5VkNqaWKmj2OwT4yNsC9zvpVCwXN2ythxR0UW/m28CF9b06H1Ngz/y9pDA48x6AzGLg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:578e:: with SMTP id k14mr7108279ejq.243.1611972544062; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 18:09:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from skbuf (5-12-227-87.residential.rdsnet.ro. [5.12.227.87]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bk2sm4670563ejb.98.2021.01.29.18.09.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 29 Jan 2021 18:09:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 04:09:02 +0200 From: Vladimir Oltean To: Florian Fainelli Cc: Prasanna Vengateshan , andrew@lunn.ch, netdev@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, vivien.didelot@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Woojung.Huh@microchip.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] net: dsa: microchip: DSA driver support for LAN937x switch Message-ID: <20210130020902.546lmczy75pgdadi@skbuf> References: <20210128064112.372883-1-prasanna.vengateshan@microchip.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 09:55:58AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > Could you also feed back to your hardware organization to settle on a > tag format that is not a snowflake? Almost *every* switch you have has a > different tagging format, this is absurd. All other vendors in tree have > been able to settle on at most 2 or 3 different tagging formats over > their switching product life span (for some vendors this dates back 20 > years ago). You can't stop them from innovating, Florian :(