linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Giancarlo Ferrari <giancarlo.ferrari89@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	rppt@kernel.org, penberg@kernel.org, geert@linux-m68k.org,
	giancarlo.ferrari@nokia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: kexec: Fix panic after TLB are invalidated
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 15:30:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210201153012.GC66060@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210201143943.GA15399@p4>

Hi,

On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 02:39:46PM +0000, Giancarlo Ferrari wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 12:47:20PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 12:44:56AM +0000, Giancarlo Ferrari wrote:
> > > machine_kexec() need to set rw permission in text and rodata sections
> > > to assign some variables (e.g. kexec_start_address). To do that at
> > > the end (after flushing pdm in memory, etc.) it needs to invalidate
> > > TLB [section] entries.
> > 
> > It'd be worth noting explicitly that set_kernel_text_rw() alters
> > current->active_mm...
> > 
> > > If during the TLB invalidation an interrupt occours, which might cause
> > > a context switch, there is the risk to inject invalid TLBs, with ro
> > > permissions.
> > 
> > ... which is why if there's a context switch things can go wrong, since
> > active_mm isn't stable, and so it's possible that set_kernel_text_rw()
> > updates multiple tables, none of which might be the active table at the
> > point we try to make an access.
> 
> Maybe the behaviour causing issue is not completely clear to me, and I do
> apologize for that (moreover I haven't eougth debug capabilities).

I think we're in rough agreement that the issue is likely related to the
context switch, but our understanding of the specifics differs (and I
think we're missing a detail here).

> However, current-active_mm is switched among context switches. Correct ?

In some cases current->active_mm is not switched, and can be inherited
over a context switch. When switching to a user task, we always switch
to its mm (which becomes the active_mm), but when switching to a kthread
we retain the previous task's mm as the active_mm as part of the lazy
context switch.

So while a kthread is preemptible, its active_mm (and active ASID) can
change under its feet. That could happen anywhere while the task is
preemptible, e.g. in the middle of set_kernel_text_rw(), or
mid-modification to the kexec variables.

> So, in principle, the invalidation, if stopped, is carried on where it
> left.

That's true so long as all the processes we switch between share the
same leaf tables for the region we're altering. If not, then the lazy
context switch means that those tables can change under our feet.

I believe the tables mapping the kernel text are shared by all threads,
and if so this _should_ be true. Russell might be able to confirm that
or correct me if I have that wrong.

> I thought the issue was that the PageTable entry for the section 0x8010_0000
> is global, thus not indexed by ASID (Address Space ID). By the fact that each
> process has its own version of that entry, is the cause of the issue, as the
> schedule process might bringing a spurious entry (with ro permission) in the
> MMU cache.

The TLB invalidation performed under set_kernel_text_rw() affects all
ASIDs on the current CPU, so there shouldn't be any stale RO TLB entries
to hit unless the kthread is migrated to another CPU.

> If the entry is not global holds the ASID, and the issue cannot happen.

I don't think that's true, since switching to a different active_mm
would also change ASID, and we'd have no additional guarantee.

Thanks,
Mark.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-01 15:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-01  0:44 [PATCH] ARM: kexec: Fix panic after TLB are invalidated Giancarlo Ferrari
2021-02-01 11:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-02-01 12:47 ` Mark Rutland
2021-02-01 13:03   ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-02-01 13:57     ` Mark Rutland
2021-02-01 16:08       ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-02-01 16:32         ` Mark Rutland
2021-02-01 16:37           ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-02-01 20:07         ` Giancarlo Ferrari
2021-02-01 20:16           ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-02-01 22:18             ` Giancarlo Ferrari
2021-02-04 23:48               ` Giancarlo Ferrari
2021-02-05  0:18                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-02-05  0:40                   ` Giancarlo Ferrari
2021-02-05  0:45                     ` Giancarlo Ferrari
2021-02-05  9:44                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-02-05 14:36                       ` Giancarlo Ferrari
2021-02-01 14:39   ` Giancarlo Ferrari
2021-02-01 15:30     ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2021-02-01 19:09       ` Giancarlo Ferrari
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-01-12 16:49 Giancarlo Ferrari
2021-02-01 10:10 ` Giancarlo Ferrari

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210201153012.GC66060@C02TD0UTHF1T.local \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=giancarlo.ferrari89@gmail.com \
    --cc=giancarlo.ferrari@nokia.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).