linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com>
To: Si-Wei Liu <siwliu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: <mst@redhat.com>, <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<lulu@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: Restore the hardware used index after change map
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 08:48:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210203064812.GA33072@mtl-vdi-166.wap.labs.mlnx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPWQSg3Z1aCZc7kX2x_4NLtAzkrZ+eO5ABBF0bAQfaLc=++Y2Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 09:14:02AM -0800, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 6:34 AM Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >
> > When a change of memory map occurs, the hardware resources are destroyed
> > and then re-created again with the new memory map. In such case, we need
> > to restore the hardware available and used indices. The driver failed to
> > restore the used index which is added here.
> >
> > Fixes 1a86b377aa21 ("vdpa/mlx5: Add VDPA driver for supported mlx5 devices")
> > Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> > This patch is being sent again a single patch the fixes hot memory
> > addtion to a qemy process.
> >
> >  drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 7 +++++++
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > index 88dde3455bfd..839f57c64a6f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ struct mlx5_vq_restore_info {
> >         u64 device_addr;
> >         u64 driver_addr;
> >         u16 avail_index;
> > +       u16 used_index;
> >         bool ready;
> >         struct vdpa_callback cb;
> >         bool restore;
> > @@ -121,6 +122,7 @@ struct mlx5_vdpa_virtqueue {
> >         u32 virtq_id;
> >         struct mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev;
> >         u16 avail_idx;
> > +       u16 used_idx;
> >         int fw_state;
> >
> >         /* keep last in the struct */
> > @@ -804,6 +806,7 @@ static int create_virtqueue(struct mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev, struct mlx5_vdpa_virtque
> >
> >         obj_context = MLX5_ADDR_OF(create_virtio_net_q_in, in, obj_context);
> >         MLX5_SET(virtio_net_q_object, obj_context, hw_available_index, mvq->avail_idx);
> > +       MLX5_SET(virtio_net_q_object, obj_context, hw_used_index, mvq->used_idx);
> 
> The saved indexes will apply to the new virtqueue object whenever it
> is created. In virtio spec, these indexes will reset back to zero when
> the virtio device is reset. But I don't see how it's done today. IOW,
> I don't see where avail_idx and used_idx get cleared from the mvq for
> device reset via set_status().
> 

Right, but this is not strictly related to this patch. I will post
another patch to fix this.

BTW, can you describe a secnario that would cause a reset (through
calling set_status()) that happens after the VQ has been used?

> -Siwei
> 
> 
> >         MLX5_SET(virtio_net_q_object, obj_context, queue_feature_bit_mask_12_3,
> >                  get_features_12_3(ndev->mvdev.actual_features));
> >         vq_ctx = MLX5_ADDR_OF(virtio_net_q_object, obj_context, virtio_q_context);
> > @@ -1022,6 +1025,7 @@ static int connect_qps(struct mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev, struct mlx5_vdpa_virtqueue *m
> >  struct mlx5_virtq_attr {
> >         u8 state;
> >         u16 available_index;
> > +       u16 used_index;
> >  };
> >
> >  static int query_virtqueue(struct mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev, struct mlx5_vdpa_virtqueue *mvq,
> > @@ -1052,6 +1056,7 @@ static int query_virtqueue(struct mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev, struct mlx5_vdpa_virtqueu
> >         memset(attr, 0, sizeof(*attr));
> >         attr->state = MLX5_GET(virtio_net_q_object, obj_context, state);
> >         attr->available_index = MLX5_GET(virtio_net_q_object, obj_context, hw_available_index);
> > +       attr->used_index = MLX5_GET(virtio_net_q_object, obj_context, hw_used_index);
> >         kfree(out);
> >         return 0;
> >
> > @@ -1610,6 +1615,7 @@ static int save_channel_info(struct mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev, struct mlx5_vdpa_virtqu
> >                 return err;
> >
> >         ri->avail_index = attr.available_index;
> > +       ri->used_index = attr.used_index;
> >         ri->ready = mvq->ready;
> >         ri->num_ent = mvq->num_ent;
> >         ri->desc_addr = mvq->desc_addr;
> > @@ -1654,6 +1660,7 @@ static void restore_channels_info(struct mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev)
> >                         continue;
> >
> >                 mvq->avail_idx = ri->avail_index;
> > +               mvq->used_idx = ri->used_index;
> >                 mvq->ready = ri->ready;
> >                 mvq->num_ent = ri->num_ent;
> >                 mvq->desc_addr = ri->desc_addr;
> > --
> > 2.29.2
> >

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-03  6:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-02 14:29 [PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: Restore the hardware used index after change map Eli Cohen
2021-02-02 17:14 ` Si-Wei Liu
2021-02-03  6:48   ` Eli Cohen [this message]
2021-02-03 20:33     ` Si-Wei Liu
2021-02-04  7:06       ` Eli Cohen
2021-02-04  7:19       ` Eli Cohen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210203064812.GA33072@mtl-vdi-166.wap.labs.mlnx \
    --to=elic@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lulu@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=siwliu.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).