From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEBE3C433E0 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 11:54:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C2B364F77 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 11:54:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234237AbhBCLyS (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2021 06:54:18 -0500 Received: from m12-14.163.com ([220.181.12.14]:57387 "EHLO m12-14.163.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234057AbhBCLyR (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2021 06:54:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=Date:From:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; bh=Ql/Fl kYe33gSyZXRWYjYiF8nirZv149/fAHCmTdjR2M=; b=guzMY7/izVvYzxRuxydsr bW3hVGzfG/qrwupLHudrhLvB2wwBcNxaQ/B+MGHxWlE0qjZyGTOEmP5TQX6nRkaN eMBXTToNaZn9VfCLAV5Lx0Fdvsn60AmgWUVZJOrEX61kpT19Fq6FLln5O1hgeDXD 7ZppFuvOL8zv+XohostxiQ= Received: from localhost (unknown [119.137.55.230]) by smtp10 (Coremail) with SMTP id DsCowAAnh3+eihpgeNTRjA--.924S2; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 19:35:59 +0800 (CST) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 19:36:09 +0800 From: wengjianfeng To: Daniel Thompson Cc: jason.wessel@windriver.com, dianders@chromium.org, kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wengjianfeng Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: debug: fix typo issue Message-ID: <20210203193609.00007678@163.com> In-Reply-To: <20210203112359.cdy73gw4wip5cnyn@maple.lan> References: <20210203081034.9004-1-samirweng1979@163.com> <20210203112359.cdy73gw4wip5cnyn@maple.lan> Organization: yulong X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; i686-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CM-TRANSID: DsCowAAnh3+eihpgeNTRjA--.924S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvJXoW7tr18Jr43AFWrKFyDKry8Zrb_yoW8Wr4UpF WxKa4rKF4xJry0ga1SyanIqFyjg34rtw4v9rZ0yas5CF15ZF97XF4kWay5ur4DZrWkWry5 tr4qga48ZwnrXFJanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDUYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07j79N3UUUUU= X-Originating-IP: [119.137.55.230] X-CM-SenderInfo: pvdpx25zhqwiqzxzqiywtou0bp/1tbiER8usV7+2s8ymgAAsM Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 11:23:59 +0000 Daniel Thompson wrote: > On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 04:10:34PM +0800, samirweng1979 wrote: > > From: wengjianfeng > > > > change 'regster' to 'register'. > > > > Signed-off-by: wengjianfeng > > It looks like the Subject line might not be correct for this patch? > > Is it really the first time this patch has been circulated or should > it have been tagged RESEND or v2? > > > Daniel. > > > > --- > > kernel/debug/gdbstub.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c b/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c > > index a77df59..e149a0a 100644 > > --- a/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c > > +++ b/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c > > @@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ static char *gdb_hex_reg_helper(int regnum, > > char *out) dbg_reg_def[i].size); > > } > > > > -/* Handle the 'p' individual regster get */ > > +/* Handle the 'p' individual register get */ > > static void gdb_cmd_reg_get(struct kgdb_state *ks) > > { > > unsigned long regnum; > > @@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ static void gdb_cmd_reg_get(struct kgdb_state > > *ks) gdb_hex_reg_helper(regnum, remcom_out_buffer); > > } > > > > -/* Handle the 'P' individual regster set */ > > +/* Handle the 'P' individual register set */ > > static void gdb_cmd_reg_set(struct kgdb_state *ks) > > { > > unsigned long regnum; > > -- > > 1.9.1 > > > > Hi Daniel, The patch was first sent on January 25, but nobody relply me, so I just resend the patch, and the patch is the same as last time,does I need add RESEND tag? thanks.