From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 357D3C433E0 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 04:43:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD59564F4D for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 04:43:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231440AbhBDEn0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2021 23:43:26 -0500 Received: from m12-16.163.com ([220.181.12.16]:33946 "EHLO m12-16.163.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229601AbhBDEnX (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2021 23:43:23 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=Date:From:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; bh=GIyNb ave6wKEQYpyFc7Z4WZNIdF9Yp34fkRVzgFa2XY=; b=qBSIabZN2oEMl+HRtMALK HquMTpZCl/w5Fs2TZD0ymhLp7VDr5SuY4iEV1St62CfdLUaTEqxYnAp8L5YbXksa nxtZ1xNSPObZuya616V8zAD2VCI9nYtMvIVavZ4zAzZZFKruxQKufQBcZMcWvp2t d31CFaDDGo8w+pyzWAnAJ0= Received: from localhost (unknown [218.17.89.92]) by smtp12 (Coremail) with SMTP id EMCowADXykQ3QhtgZMSSaQ--.21799S2; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 08:39:20 +0800 (CST) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 08:39:31 +0800 From: wengjianfeng To: Randy Dunlap Cc: stf_xl@wp.pl, helmut.schaa@googlemail.com, kvalo@codeaurora.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wengjianfeng Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt2x00: remove duplicate word in comment Message-ID: <20210204083931.00004d11@163.com> In-Reply-To: <1ee1b354-0550-3fd8-f547-10827b3974ad@infradead.org> References: <20210203063850.15844-1-samirweng1979@163.com> <6bf90f62-f14e-9c4a-748b-4923fcae9bef@infradead.org> <20210204083007.000069d2@163.com> <1ee1b354-0550-3fd8-f547-10827b3974ad@infradead.org> Organization: yulong X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; i686-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB18030 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: EMCowADXykQ3QhtgZMSSaQ--.21799S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvJXoWxJry5CF1DWr4rCF4rZF1rCrg_yoW8Ar13pF WrGFW0kFWDGwnrWa4xtayfXryYva4rKr12qrWDW3yrZrn0vr1rJr97GF18u3WDJw48Ga4j vr4xt3W3WF9xZa7anT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDUYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07bFlksUUUUU= X-Originating-IP: [218.17.89.92] X-CM-SenderInfo: pvdpx25zhqwiqzxzqiywtou0bp/1tbiqhgvsVr7sBIkNwAAs8 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 16:33:37 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 2/3/21 4:30 PM, wengjianfeng wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 07:16:17 -0800 > > Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > >> On 2/2/21 10:38 PM, samirweng1979 wrote: > >>> From: wengjianfeng > >>> > >>> remove duplicate word 'we' in comment > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: wengjianfeng > >>> --- > >>> drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c | 2 +- > >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c > >>> b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c index > >>> c861811..7158152 100644 --- > >>> a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c +++ > >>> b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c @@ -179,7 > >>> +179,7 @@ void rt2x00crypto_rx_insert_iv(struct sk_buff *skb, > >>> * Make room for new data. There are 2 possibilities > >>> * either the alignment is already present between > >>> * the 802.11 header and payload. In that case we > >>> - * we have to move the header less then the iv_len > >>> + * have to move the header less then the iv_len > >> > >> s/then/than/ > >> > >>> * since we can use the already available l2pad bytes > >>> * for the iv data. > >>> * When the alignment must be added manually we must > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Hi Randy, > > So you means add it for byte alignment, right? if yes,just ignore > > the patch. thanks. > > No, I mean that there is a typo there also: "then" should be changed > to "than" while you are making changes. > > thanks. Hi Randy£¬ Ok£¬ I¡¡will update the patch£¬thanks for your reply.