From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED999C433E0 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 19:17:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B81EC64F64 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 19:17:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239761AbhBDTRM (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Feb 2021 14:17:12 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:56900 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239697AbhBDTPJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Feb 2021 14:15:09 -0500 IronPort-SDR: hOrtUvbYDXUK9qcHYFrJYEkYg22IDabd0vZIjo4Zc+20FVs65zJAKgFUtfT2vzhIVKaCwn2WJQ VZYxTdzEa7AA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9885"; a="180536554" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,153,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="180536554" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Feb 2021 11:14:27 -0800 IronPort-SDR: VzWfKZDXr+dg50STTy+StVAYb7JNjC42vWasa5Fg1uqgp9yBQMK29R72QK6mYCipNB6L3iIeQN 0c6b2dxjuh+w== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,153,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="393330204" Received: from jbrandeb-mobl4.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.212.188.246]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Feb 2021 11:14:27 -0800 Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 11:14:26 -0800 From: Jesse Brandeburg To: Zheng Yongjun Cc: , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Return the correct errno code Message-ID: <20210204111426.00001bba@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20210204085630.19452-1-zhengyongjun3@huawei.com> References: <20210204085630.19452-1-zhengyongjun3@huawei.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; i686-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Zheng Yongjun wrote: > When kzalloc failed, should return ENOMEM rather than ENOBUFS. All these patches have the same subject and description, couldn't they just be part of a single series with a good cover letter? I'm not saying make them a single patch, because that is bad for bisection, but having them as a single series means we review related changes at one time, and can comment on them as a group.