linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [Patch v3 net-next 7/7] octeontx2-pf: ethtool physical link configuration
@ 2021-02-05 14:15 Hariprasad Kelam
  2021-02-05 19:25 ` Jakub Kicinski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Hariprasad Kelam @ 2021-02-05 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jakub Kicinski
  Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, davem, willemdebruijn.kernel, andrew,
	Sunil Kovvuri Goutham, Linu Cherian, Geethasowjanya Akula,
	Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran, Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta

Hi Jakub,



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> Sent: Friday, February 5, 2021 12:21 AM
> To: Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@marvell.com>
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> davem@davemloft.net; willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com;
> andrew@lunn.ch; Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@marvell.com>; Linu
> Cherian <lcherian@marvell.com>; Geethasowjanya Akula
> <gakula@marvell.com>; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>;
> Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta <sbhatta@marvell.com>
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [Patch v3 net-next 7/7] octeontx2-pf: ethtool physical link
> configuration
> 
> On Thu, 4 Feb 2021 17:37:41 +0000 Hariprasad Kelam wrote:
> > > > +	req->args.speed = req_ks.base.speed;
> > > > +	/* firmware expects 1 for half duplex and 0 for full duplex
> > > > +	 * hence inverting
> > > > +	 */
> > > > +	req->args.duplex = req_ks.base.duplex ^ 0x1;
> > > > +	req->args.an = req_ks.base.autoneg;
> > > > +	otx2_get_advertised_mode(&req_ks, &req->args.mode);
> > >
> > > But that only returns the first bit set. What does the device
> > > actually do? What if the user cleared a middle bit?
> > >
> > This is initial patch series to support advertised modes. Current
> > firmware design is such that It can handle only one advertised mode.
> > Due to this limitation we are always checking The first set bit in advertised
> modes and passing it to firmware.
> > Will add multi advertised mode support in near future.
> 
> Looking at patch 6 it seems like the get side already supports multiple modes,
> although the example output only lists supported no advertised.
> 
> Is the device actually doing IEEE autoneg or just configures the speed, lanes
> etc. according to the link mode selected?

Device supports IEEE autoneg mode. Agreed get_link_ksetting returns multiple modes .  
But set side  firmware code designed in such way that  it handles  single mode. Upon
Successful configuration firmware updates advertised modes to shared memory
 such that kernel will read and updates to ethtool.

Thanks,
Hariprasad k


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [Patch v3 net-next 7/7] octeontx2-pf: ethtool physical link configuration
  2021-02-05 14:15 [Patch v3 net-next 7/7] octeontx2-pf: ethtool physical link configuration Hariprasad Kelam
@ 2021-02-05 19:25 ` Jakub Kicinski
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2021-02-05 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hariprasad Kelam
  Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, davem, willemdebruijn.kernel, andrew,
	Sunil Kovvuri Goutham, Linu Cherian, Geethasowjanya Akula,
	Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran, Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta

On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 14:15:01 +0000 Hariprasad Kelam wrote:
> > > Will add multi advertised mode support in near future.  
> > 
> > Looking at patch 6 it seems like the get side already supports multiple modes,
> > although the example output only lists supported no advertised.
> > 
> > Is the device actually doing IEEE autoneg or just configures the speed, lanes
> > etc. according to the link mode selected?  
> 
> Device supports IEEE autoneg mode. Agreed get_link_ksetting returns multiple modes .  
> But set side  firmware code designed in such way that  it handles  single mode. Upon
> Successful configuration firmware updates advertised modes to shared memory
>  such that kernel will read and updates to ethtool.

It needs to be symmetric, get needs to reflect what set specified. 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [Patch v3 net-next 7/7] octeontx2-pf: ethtool physical link configuration
@ 2021-02-07 15:22 Hariprasad Kelam
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Hariprasad Kelam @ 2021-02-07 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jakub Kicinski
  Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, davem, willemdebruijn.kernel, andrew,
	Sunil Kovvuri Goutham, Linu Cherian, Geethasowjanya Akula,
	Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran, Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta

Hi Jakub,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> Sent: Saturday, February 6, 2021 12:56 AM
> To: Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@marvell.com>
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> davem@davemloft.net; willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com;
> andrew@lunn.ch; Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@marvell.com>; Linu
> Cherian <lcherian@marvell.com>; Geethasowjanya Akula
> <gakula@marvell.com>; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>;
> Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta <sbhatta@marvell.com>
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [Patch v3 net-next 7/7] octeontx2-pf: ethtool physical link
> configuration
> 
> On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 14:15:01 +0000 Hariprasad Kelam wrote:
> > > > Will add multi advertised mode support in near future.
> > >
> > > Looking at patch 6 it seems like the get side already supports
> > > multiple modes, although the example output only lists supported no
> advertised.
> > >
> > > Is the device actually doing IEEE autoneg or just configures the
> > > speed, lanes etc. according to the link mode selected?
> >
> > Device supports IEEE autoneg mode. Agreed get_link_ksetting returns
> multiple modes .
> > But set side  firmware code designed in such way that  it handles
> > single mode. Upon Successful configuration firmware updates advertised
> > modes to shared memory  such that kernel will read and updates to
> ethtool.
> 
> It needs to be symmetric, get needs to reflect what set specified.

Agreed.  Even though set supports single mode still it is displayed with get link settings.

Thanks,
Hariprasad k

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [Patch v3 net-next 7/7] octeontx2-pf: ethtool physical link configuration
  2021-02-04 17:37 Hariprasad Kelam
@ 2021-02-04 18:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2021-02-04 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hariprasad Kelam
  Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, davem, willemdebruijn.kernel, andrew,
	Sunil Kovvuri Goutham, Linu Cherian, Geethasowjanya Akula,
	Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran, Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta

On Thu, 4 Feb 2021 17:37:41 +0000 Hariprasad Kelam wrote:
> > > +	req->args.speed = req_ks.base.speed;
> > > +	/* firmware expects 1 for half duplex and 0 for full duplex
> > > +	 * hence inverting
> > > +	 */
> > > +	req->args.duplex = req_ks.base.duplex ^ 0x1;
> > > +	req->args.an = req_ks.base.autoneg;
> > > +	otx2_get_advertised_mode(&req_ks, &req->args.mode);  
> > 
> > But that only returns the first bit set. What does the device actually do? What
> > if the user cleared a middle bit?
> >   
> This is initial patch series to support advertised modes. Current firmware design is such that
> It can handle only one advertised mode. Due to this limitation we are always checking
> The first set bit in advertised modes and passing it to firmware.
> Will add multi advertised mode support in near future.

Looking at patch 6 it seems like the get side already supports multiple
modes, although the example output only lists supported no advertised.

Is the device actually doing IEEE autoneg or just configures the speed,
lanes etc. according to the link mode selected?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [Patch v3 net-next 7/7] octeontx2-pf: ethtool physical link configuration
@ 2021-02-04 17:37 Hariprasad Kelam
  2021-02-04 18:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Hariprasad Kelam @ 2021-02-04 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jakub Kicinski
  Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, davem, willemdebruijn.kernel, andrew,
	Sunil Kovvuri Goutham, Linu Cherian, Geethasowjanya Akula,
	Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran, Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta

Hi Jakub,


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 6:59 AM
> To: Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@marvell.com>
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> davem@davemloft.net; willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com;
> andrew@lunn.ch; Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@marvell.com>; Linu
> Cherian <lcherian@marvell.com>; Geethasowjanya Akula
> <gakula@marvell.com>; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>;
> Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta <sbhatta@marvell.com>
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [Patch v3 net-next 7/7] octeontx2-pf: ethtool physical link
> configuration
> 
> On Sun, 31 Jan 2021 18:41:05 +0530 Hariprasad Kelam wrote:
> > From: Christina Jacob <cjacob@marvell.com>
> >
> > Register set_link_ksetting callback with driver such that link
> > configurations parameters like advertised mode,speed, duplex and
> > autoneg can be configured.
> >
> > below command
> > ethtool -s eth0 advertise 0x1 speed 10 duplex full autoneg on
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christina Jacob <cjacob@marvell.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@marvell.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@marvell.com>
> > ---
> >  .../ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_ethtool.c  | 67
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 67 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_ethtool.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_ethtool.c
> > index d637815..74a62de 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_ethtool.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_ethtool.c
> > @@ -1170,6 +1170,72 @@ static int otx2_get_link_ksettings(struct
> net_device *netdev,
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +static void otx2_get_advertised_mode(const struct ethtool_link_ksettings
> *cmd,
> > +				     u64 *mode)
> > +{
> > +	u32 bit_pos;
> > +
> > +	/* Firmware does not support requesting multiple advertised modes
> > +	 * return first set bit
> > +	 */
> > +	bit_pos = find_first_bit(cmd->link_modes.advertising,
> > +				 __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS);
> > +	if (bit_pos != __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS)
> > +		*mode = bit_pos;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int otx2_set_link_ksettings(struct net_device *netdev,
> > +				   const struct ethtool_link_ksettings *cmd) {
> > +	struct otx2_nic *pf = netdev_priv(netdev);
> > +	struct ethtool_link_ksettings req_ks;
> > +	struct ethtool_link_ksettings cur_ks;
> > +	struct cgx_set_link_mode_req *req;
> > +	struct mbox *mbox = &pf->mbox;
> > +	int err = 0;
> > +
> > +	/* save requested link settings */
> > +	memcpy(&req_ks, cmd, sizeof(struct ethtool_link_ksettings));
> 
> Why do you make this copy? The comment above does not help at all.
> 
Agreed copy is not necessary . Added this copy for comparing advertised modes with supported modes.
Will fix this in next version.

> > +	memset(&cur_ks, 0, sizeof(struct ethtool_link_ksettings));
> > +
> > +	if (!ethtool_validate_speed(cmd->base.speed) ||
> > +	    !ethtool_validate_duplex(cmd->base.duplex))
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	if (cmd->base.autoneg != AUTONEG_ENABLE &&
> > +	    cmd->base.autoneg != AUTONEG_DISABLE)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	otx2_get_link_ksettings(netdev, &cur_ks);
> > +
> > +	/* Check requested modes against supported modes by hardware */
> > +	if (!bitmap_subset(req_ks.link_modes.advertising,
> > +			   cur_ks.link_modes.supported,
> > +			   __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS))
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&mbox->lock);
> > +	req = otx2_mbox_alloc_msg_cgx_set_link_mode(&pf->mbox);
> > +	if (!req) {
> > +		err = -ENOMEM;
> > +		goto end;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	req->args.speed = req_ks.base.speed;
> > +	/* firmware expects 1 for half duplex and 0 for full duplex
> > +	 * hence inverting
> > +	 */
> > +	req->args.duplex = req_ks.base.duplex ^ 0x1;
> > +	req->args.an = req_ks.base.autoneg;
> > +	otx2_get_advertised_mode(&req_ks, &req->args.mode);
> 
> But that only returns the first bit set. What does the device actually do? What
> if the user cleared a middle bit?
> 
This is initial patch series to support advertised modes. Current firmware design is such that
It can handle only one advertised mode. Due to this limitation we are always checking
The first set bit in advertised modes and passing it to firmware.
Will add multi advertised mode support in near future.

Thanks,
Hariprasad k


> > +	err = otx2_sync_mbox_msg(&pf->mbox);
> > +end:
> > +	mutex_unlock(&mbox->lock);
> > +	return err;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static const struct ethtool_ops otx2_ethtool_ops = {
> >  	.supported_coalesce_params = ETHTOOL_COALESCE_USECS |
> >  				     ETHTOOL_COALESCE_MAX_FRAMES, @@
> -1200,6 +1266,7 @@ static
> > const struct ethtool_ops otx2_ethtool_ops = {
> >  	.get_fecparam		= otx2_get_fecparam,
> >  	.set_fecparam		= otx2_set_fecparam,
> >  	.get_link_ksettings     = otx2_get_link_ksettings,
> > +	.set_link_ksettings     = otx2_set_link_ksettings,
> >  };
> >
> >  void otx2_set_ethtool_ops(struct net_device *netdev)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [Patch v3 net-next 7/7] octeontx2-pf: ethtool physical link configuration
       [not found] ` <1612098665-187767-8-git-send-email-hkelam@marvell.com>
@ 2021-02-03  1:29   ` Jakub Kicinski
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2021-02-03  1:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hariprasad Kelam
  Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, davem, willemdebruijn.kernel, andrew,
	sgoutham, lcherian, gakula, jerinj, sbhatta

On Sun, 31 Jan 2021 18:41:05 +0530 Hariprasad Kelam wrote:
> From: Christina Jacob <cjacob@marvell.com>
> 
> Register set_link_ksetting callback with driver such that
> link configurations parameters like advertised mode,speed, duplex
> and autoneg can be configured.
> 
> below command
> ethtool -s eth0 advertise 0x1 speed 10 duplex full autoneg on
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christina Jacob <cjacob@marvell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@marvell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@marvell.com>
> ---
>  .../ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_ethtool.c  | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 67 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_ethtool.c
> index d637815..74a62de 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_ethtool.c
> @@ -1170,6 +1170,72 @@ static int otx2_get_link_ksettings(struct net_device *netdev,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static void otx2_get_advertised_mode(const struct ethtool_link_ksettings *cmd,
> +				     u64 *mode)
> +{
> +	u32 bit_pos;
> +
> +	/* Firmware does not support requesting multiple advertised modes
> +	 * return first set bit
> +	 */
> +	bit_pos = find_first_bit(cmd->link_modes.advertising,
> +				 __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS);
> +	if (bit_pos != __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS)
> +		*mode = bit_pos;
> +}
> +
> +static int otx2_set_link_ksettings(struct net_device *netdev,
> +				   const struct ethtool_link_ksettings *cmd)
> +{
> +	struct otx2_nic *pf = netdev_priv(netdev);
> +	struct ethtool_link_ksettings req_ks;
> +	struct ethtool_link_ksettings cur_ks;
> +	struct cgx_set_link_mode_req *req;
> +	struct mbox *mbox = &pf->mbox;
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	/* save requested link settings */
> +	memcpy(&req_ks, cmd, sizeof(struct ethtool_link_ksettings));

Why do you make this copy? The comment above does not help at all.

> +	memset(&cur_ks, 0, sizeof(struct ethtool_link_ksettings));
> +
> +	if (!ethtool_validate_speed(cmd->base.speed) ||
> +	    !ethtool_validate_duplex(cmd->base.duplex))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (cmd->base.autoneg != AUTONEG_ENABLE &&
> +	    cmd->base.autoneg != AUTONEG_DISABLE)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	otx2_get_link_ksettings(netdev, &cur_ks);
> +
> +	/* Check requested modes against supported modes by hardware */
> +	if (!bitmap_subset(req_ks.link_modes.advertising,
> +			   cur_ks.link_modes.supported,
> +			   __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&mbox->lock);
> +	req = otx2_mbox_alloc_msg_cgx_set_link_mode(&pf->mbox);
> +	if (!req) {
> +		err = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto end;
> +	}
> +
> +	req->args.speed = req_ks.base.speed;
> +	/* firmware expects 1 for half duplex and 0 for full duplex
> +	 * hence inverting
> +	 */
> +	req->args.duplex = req_ks.base.duplex ^ 0x1;
> +	req->args.an = req_ks.base.autoneg;
> +	otx2_get_advertised_mode(&req_ks, &req->args.mode);

But that only returns the first bit set. What does the device actually
do? What if the user cleared a middle bit?

> +	err = otx2_sync_mbox_msg(&pf->mbox);
> +end:
> +	mutex_unlock(&mbox->lock);
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct ethtool_ops otx2_ethtool_ops = {
>  	.supported_coalesce_params = ETHTOOL_COALESCE_USECS |
>  				     ETHTOOL_COALESCE_MAX_FRAMES,
> @@ -1200,6 +1266,7 @@ static const struct ethtool_ops otx2_ethtool_ops = {
>  	.get_fecparam		= otx2_get_fecparam,
>  	.set_fecparam		= otx2_set_fecparam,
>  	.get_link_ksettings     = otx2_get_link_ksettings,
> +	.set_link_ksettings     = otx2_set_link_ksettings,
>  };
>  
>  void otx2_set_ethtool_ops(struct net_device *netdev)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [Patch v3 net-next 7/7] octeontx2-pf: ethtool physical link configuration
  2021-02-01  5:24 ` [Patch v3 net-next 7/7] octeontx2-pf: ethtool physical " Hariprasad Kelam
@ 2021-02-03  0:48   ` Jesse Brandeburg
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jesse Brandeburg @ 2021-02-03  0:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hariprasad Kelam
  Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, kuba, davem, willemdebruijn.kernel, andrew,
	sgoutham, lcherian, gakula, jerinj, sbhatta

Hariprasad Kelam wrote:

> From: Christina Jacob <cjacob@marvell.com>
> 
> Register set_link_ksetting callback with driver such that
> link configurations parameters like advertised mode,speed, duplex
> and autoneg can be configured.
> 
> below command
> ethtool -s eth0 advertise 0x1 speed 10 duplex full autoneg on
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christina Jacob <cjacob@marvell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@marvell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@marvell.com>

Reviewed-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Patch v3 net-next 7/7] octeontx2-pf: ethtool physical link configuration
  2021-02-01  5:24 [Patch v3 net-next 0/7] ethtool support for fec and " Hariprasad Kelam
@ 2021-02-01  5:24 ` Hariprasad Kelam
  2021-02-03  0:48   ` Jesse Brandeburg
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Hariprasad Kelam @ 2021-02-01  5:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev, linux-kernel
  Cc: kuba, davem, willemdebruijn.kernel, andrew, sgoutham, lcherian,
	gakula, jerinj, sbhatta, hkelam

From: Christina Jacob <cjacob@marvell.com>

Register set_link_ksetting callback with driver such that
link configurations parameters like advertised mode,speed, duplex
and autoneg can be configured.

below command
ethtool -s eth0 advertise 0x1 speed 10 duplex full autoneg on

Signed-off-by: Christina Jacob <cjacob@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@marvell.com>
---
 .../ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_ethtool.c  | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_ethtool.c
index d637815..74a62de 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_ethtool.c
@@ -1170,6 +1170,72 @@ static int otx2_get_link_ksettings(struct net_device *netdev,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void otx2_get_advertised_mode(const struct ethtool_link_ksettings *cmd,
+				     u64 *mode)
+{
+	u32 bit_pos;
+
+	/* Firmware does not support requesting multiple advertised modes
+	 * return first set bit
+	 */
+	bit_pos = find_first_bit(cmd->link_modes.advertising,
+				 __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS);
+	if (bit_pos != __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS)
+		*mode = bit_pos;
+}
+
+static int otx2_set_link_ksettings(struct net_device *netdev,
+				   const struct ethtool_link_ksettings *cmd)
+{
+	struct otx2_nic *pf = netdev_priv(netdev);
+	struct ethtool_link_ksettings req_ks;
+	struct ethtool_link_ksettings cur_ks;
+	struct cgx_set_link_mode_req *req;
+	struct mbox *mbox = &pf->mbox;
+	int err = 0;
+
+	/* save requested link settings */
+	memcpy(&req_ks, cmd, sizeof(struct ethtool_link_ksettings));
+
+	memset(&cur_ks, 0, sizeof(struct ethtool_link_ksettings));
+
+	if (!ethtool_validate_speed(cmd->base.speed) ||
+	    !ethtool_validate_duplex(cmd->base.duplex))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (cmd->base.autoneg != AUTONEG_ENABLE &&
+	    cmd->base.autoneg != AUTONEG_DISABLE)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	otx2_get_link_ksettings(netdev, &cur_ks);
+
+	/* Check requested modes against supported modes by hardware */
+	if (!bitmap_subset(req_ks.link_modes.advertising,
+			   cur_ks.link_modes.supported,
+			   __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	mutex_lock(&mbox->lock);
+	req = otx2_mbox_alloc_msg_cgx_set_link_mode(&pf->mbox);
+	if (!req) {
+		err = -ENOMEM;
+		goto end;
+	}
+
+	req->args.speed = req_ks.base.speed;
+	/* firmware expects 1 for half duplex and 0 for full duplex
+	 * hence inverting
+	 */
+	req->args.duplex = req_ks.base.duplex ^ 0x1;
+	req->args.an = req_ks.base.autoneg;
+	otx2_get_advertised_mode(&req_ks, &req->args.mode);
+
+	err = otx2_sync_mbox_msg(&pf->mbox);
+end:
+	mutex_unlock(&mbox->lock);
+	return err;
+}
+
 static const struct ethtool_ops otx2_ethtool_ops = {
 	.supported_coalesce_params = ETHTOOL_COALESCE_USECS |
 				     ETHTOOL_COALESCE_MAX_FRAMES,
@@ -1200,6 +1266,7 @@ static const struct ethtool_ops otx2_ethtool_ops = {
 	.get_fecparam		= otx2_get_fecparam,
 	.set_fecparam		= otx2_set_fecparam,
 	.get_link_ksettings     = otx2_get_link_ksettings,
+	.set_link_ksettings     = otx2_set_link_ksettings,
 };
 
 void otx2_set_ethtool_ops(struct net_device *netdev)
-- 
2.7.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-02-07 15:28 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-02-05 14:15 [Patch v3 net-next 7/7] octeontx2-pf: ethtool physical link configuration Hariprasad Kelam
2021-02-05 19:25 ` Jakub Kicinski
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-02-07 15:22 Hariprasad Kelam
2021-02-04 17:37 Hariprasad Kelam
2021-02-04 18:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
     [not found] <1612098665-187767-1-git-send-email-hkelam@marvell.com>
     [not found] ` <1612098665-187767-8-git-send-email-hkelam@marvell.com>
2021-02-03  1:29   ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-02-01  5:24 [Patch v3 net-next 0/7] ethtool support for fec and " Hariprasad Kelam
2021-02-01  5:24 ` [Patch v3 net-next 7/7] octeontx2-pf: ethtool physical " Hariprasad Kelam
2021-02-03  0:48   ` Jesse Brandeburg

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).