From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/12] x86/irq/64: Inline irq stack switching
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 13:47:30 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202102081346.37FE3A0@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210204204903.350275743@linutronix.de>
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 09:49:03PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> - The fact that the stack switching code ended up being an easy to find
> exploit gadget.
Thanks for cleaning this up! It looks much much safer now. :)
> The patches have been tested with gcc8, gcc10 and clang-13 (fresh from
> git). The difference between the output of these compilers is minimal.
> gcc8 being slightly worse due to stupid register selection and random
> NOPs injected.
Awesome. Please consider the series:
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
--
Kees Cook
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-08 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-04 20:49 [patch 00/12] x86/irq/64: Inline irq stack switching Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 01/12] x86/entry: Fix instrumentation annotation Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-05 12:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 02/12] x86/irq: Sanitize irq stack tracking Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 03/12] x86/irq/64: Adjust the per CPU irq stack pointer by 8 Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-05 13:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-05 15:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 04/12] x86/apic: Split out spurious handling code Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 05/12] x86/irq: Provide macro for inlining irq stack switching Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-08 15:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-08 20:42 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-02-09 15:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-09 16:22 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-02-09 18:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 06/12] x86/entry: Convert system vectors to irq stack macro Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-05 3:52 ` kernel test robot
2021-02-05 14:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-07 8:15 ` [kbuild-all] " Rong Chen
2021-02-08 14:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-09 8:57 ` Rong Chen
2021-02-09 10:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 07/12] x86/entry: Convert device interrupts to inline stack switching Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 08/12] x86/entry: Use run_sysvec_on_irqstack_cond() for XEN upcall Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-05 7:28 ` kernel test robot
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 09/12] x86/softirq: Remove indirection in do_softirq_own_stack() Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 10/12] x86: Select CONFIG_HAVE_IRQ_EXIT_ON_IRQ_STACK Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 11/12] softirq: Allow inlining do_softirq_own_stack() Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-05 10:14 ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-02-05 11:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-09 20:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 12/12] x86/softirq/64: Inline do_softirq_own_stack() Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-08 21:47 ` Kees Cook [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202102081346.37FE3A0@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).