On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 08:33:50AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Feb 2021, Mark Brown wrote:

> > No, it's that there's plenty of drivers like this that are listed in
> > MAINTAINERS but still generally go through subsystem trees - this is
> > also true of for quite a few MFD drivers, you tend to get a bit annoyed
> > (quite reasonably) whenever I mistakenly pull MFD changes for them into
> > one of my trees without syncing with you.

> Driver Maintainers in MFD don't sent Acks.

Ah, that's not the case elsewhere (and there's the case where the driver
maintainer is sending patches for their own driver which causes a bit of
confusion).

> > I guess, or at least a pull request so it's in my tree and I'll notice
> > any coverage issues.

> Okay, I'll process it.

Thanks, pulled it in now.