From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E095DC433DB for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 05:15:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2FFA64DFF for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 05:15:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231193AbhBJFOr (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Feb 2021 00:14:47 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35492 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230368AbhBJFOn (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Feb 2021 00:14:43 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x533.google.com (mail-pg1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::533]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF748C061788 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 21:13:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x533.google.com with SMTP id t26so488513pgv.3 for ; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 21:13:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=pO3lkyqchaYYvHw0M6i1yFLd4JchiSimkLF+9OaaS4k=; b=PWZOvzgMLbj7RMzzT+oZtCfRn+XY/NWVebBDvtdZNCMZyjY01OJ0k7VTLbRJioC3w/ 9ikKTLQPZTQwJx2pzgU9qcNpllDN1LfJD9zgHhA9NauSL6CorGdiYVF8UbTXOFMyKsj4 IWmjPbfirZQDe/e+HfNGHNIT1PNJNF1bTux/nm2sDxTyrhYMbiU/15kyyWvV5OlDn/8a Z2kZQoL398q9cwNuYRMHqO7u2j3Nyy14MMxpnVpIdNHqDIDnvrpNJsO0UxajEGREgTXv lrJWpAFuSwYL3qX6R7nTllwHORP++UZB/57sPHGyWycj/jT2wMqoFf60s31a9cKKiVpI N9UQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=pO3lkyqchaYYvHw0M6i1yFLd4JchiSimkLF+9OaaS4k=; b=WSVWcqot9EIQ9bxiHK5LFTpriQFcG3Aj0PbJsZIMF8aEBpV28GEsFKH4hiTa6SQtDQ NAZ/l/V1nfVus0JajUlUfMa992oWMebAftrp8AroFSoi/r7GFMx0JudF5mME23sUY+jj /+kI83CK4qamDthPi4Yqt1pqeecNgt/szZB7L+9ndFcCYzH3x0MbPxgMtgQehjZIMrbK vqgyzZ6XghZUwqNUjBghGxWD3mEI8UR4i5oEzkQIlmXWqFbFgk/2ZLD44+YnAj5DTkeH VnZlpuex+oHDLeJJq6abdpHVnndN6hCcFk0wjB2mAFQVOUcfROekwa8O0BWMoeHrOTCa tbJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532B8pykkacaBiKvGLMzuClEm2JJbkpfUpPyC5zH7dQfEM8SVpEA AcKd8FvwcCU2rC6AhrUnfe4HkQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw5n3egOAVJeYZPlVVxWxFxfAnU6kKInAnwrHbcQbub2l1W2oW3U/73yADLfrLAiswp8pgHPg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:ef14:: with SMTP id u20mr1507445pgh.93.1612934023032; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 21:13:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([122.172.59.240]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j9sm618424pjn.32.2021.02.09.21.13.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Feb 2021 21:13:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 10:43:39 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Bjorn Andersson Cc: Taniya Das , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , agross@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, amit.kucheria@linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@somainline.org, marijn.suijten@somainline.org, martin.botka@somainline.org, jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Implement CPRh aware OSM programming Message-ID: <20210210051339.ixagw6gfipdzwgae@vireshk-i7> References: <20210119174557.227318-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org> <20210119174557.227318-6-angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 20-01-21, 13:05, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Wed 20 Jan 12:25 CST 2021, Taniya Das wrote: > > > The CPUFREQ-HW driver is intended to be used only for CPUFREQ HW designs > > where the firmware programs the look up tables. > > > > It's obvious that this is the intended target for the current version of > the driver, but what are your technical arguments for keeping it that > way? > > > Suggestion is to separate out the driver where the programming is managed by > > high level OS. > > > > Can you please elaborate on the benefits of this approach? > > PS. Please don't top-post on LKML. Taniya, Can you please respond back to this ? We are waiting for merging this patchset.. Bjorn, can you or someone else please review this patch ? -- viresh