From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C49C433E0 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:58:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CF0D64DD6 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:58:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229876AbhBKI4p (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2021 03:56:45 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53588 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229794AbhBKIzv (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2021 03:55:51 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x331.google.com (mail-wm1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::331]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1407DC061574 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 00:41:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x331.google.com with SMTP id n10so2843363wmq.0 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 00:40:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=IdP+qyRSFybI1/gnZTWLtvslIUuKOdoDM3GLkBcoXRI=; b=kWQF1mopki4JCJLZ0q88KjoCNZGWx9kCDvs/srjKZESDvNeL1lJ0cJQk6yKZV0+St9 hAfy8w1RX94b0SpG3RL2cs26QEzBxnBskmQ6l6m2bUM4sQd6OdPb/JVM5q8dbcG7CYrz Vn53yJ3gbLqwl0fjAkPN23h2YgCHTDWJD13NdbBBBvb5UnDzdkW2BFMOlaNzmj6IULlP LtGXBWKgWUM90oKKD1LfUj95lVFpHPgd+unGOrUkAf8t1VuOHHhai/4/KtRoBILvb7Nw fOF0z4RJIlNP/hmFckZmpuc3v0zSAfP6wyslDhQEYiBjPqLuj33f6xf922/txrVo9uUQ VOeA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=IdP+qyRSFybI1/gnZTWLtvslIUuKOdoDM3GLkBcoXRI=; b=BnITuZ+DB3Q9ePx1NK214fmgtF4LerFH5r8yGjhdmfNu1ejS9RZTbL/1KqfLws61Mt zr/YgOMB85fyRj0DGPrbJwin8vZ/BFqLjyJhMcdbXK6D54sk6RCbq0lj07TAHH5qTSdM vE4xe10D2PjGGuA+vuIwFUXJ8XAufISx8HlrkCfUiDed6WkRGpY3DdF831KSiCHzX/hK kRo0jfMFgc+AEte69g+2D6fvFWqicNkNthp0hNWeKaYolzxmwfsjgbludpVqkKjrUcNp aYX1xfqxBPGW2tuULaCqeQkfAb9hmjl3kz/EjL/wiBLztBASgbVBsesA0jR6SUKmDXkk D5Wg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533P7kSi3uAsg2t+QORIO1lcMMZ4bzFzIceKgYckrSC6lrEXg2h8 cByHXlGr/urEgVkz8zP5XNj1Vg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxqlintMbTctXKkk2dBHU/1iC2hNdGDbuAnHCrU5zv2rKdmvfxPBiegzVWMHdRp3seLp2WNww== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:ca57:: with SMTP id m23mr3885442wml.116.1613032858007; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 00:40:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from dell ([91.110.221.159]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g62sm8632458wmf.46.2021.02.11.00.40.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 11 Feb 2021 00:40:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:40:55 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Mark Brown Cc: Hans de Goede , MyungJoo Ham , Chanwoo Choi , Cezary Rojewski , Pierre-Louis Bossart , Liam Girdwood , Jie Yang , patches@opensource.cirrus.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko , Charles Keepax , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 resend 00/13] MFD/extcon/ASoC: Rework arizona codec jack-detect support Message-ID: <20210211084055.GA4572@dell> References: <20210204112502.88362-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20210209141420.GE4766@dell> <20210209154511.GC220368@dell> <20210210195700.GG4748@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20210210195700.GG4748@sirena.org.uk> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 10 Feb 2021, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 03:45:11PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Tue, 09 Feb 2021, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > > The alternative is Mark doing a PR from ASoC to MFD to get 5/5 from the previous set > > > in MFD first, which seems less then ideal. > > > Well this set isn't likely to go in this cycle anyway, so actually the > > problem should just go away. Best to let the first set get sucked > > into v5.12, then send this one up subsequently for v5.13. > > Yeah, that's probably easiest at this point. the only other option that > looks viable would be to add the MFD and extcon parts to the branch you > already have, me to pull that in and then apply the ASoC bits in ASoC. I'm not taking any more patches for this cycle anyway. Best wait. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog