From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Make alloc_contig_range handle free hugetlb pages
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 12:17:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210219111703.GA20286@linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YC+ZBIwXKEZCy1Bk@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 11:55:00AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> It is not the lock that I care about but more about counters. The
> intention was that there is a single place to handle both enqueing and
> dequeing. As not all places require counters to be updated. E.g. the
> migration which just replaces one page by another.
I see.
alloc_fresh_huge_page->prep_new_huge_page increments h->nr_huge_pages{_node}
counters.
Which means:
> new_page = alloc_fresh_huge_page();
> if (!new_page)
> goto fail;
> spin_lock(hugetlb_lock);
> if (!PageHuge(old_page)) {
> /* freed from under us, nothing to do */
> __update_and_free_page(new_page);
Here we need update_and_free_page, otherwise we would be leaving a stale value
in h->nr_huge_pages{_node}.
> goto unlock;
> }
> list_del(&old_page->lru);
> __update_and_free_page(old_page);
Same here.
> __enqueue_huge_page(new_page);
This is ok since h->free_huge_pages{_node} do not need to be updated.
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-19 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-17 10:08 [PATCH 0/2] Make alloc_contig_range handle Hugetlb pages Oscar Salvador
2021-02-17 10:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: Make alloc_contig_range handle free hugetlb pages Oscar Salvador
2021-02-17 13:30 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-17 13:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-17 13:50 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-17 13:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-17 13:59 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-17 14:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-17 14:14 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-17 14:23 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-02-17 13:42 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-02-17 15:00 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-18 10:09 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-02-18 12:52 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-18 13:32 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-02-18 13:59 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-18 16:53 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-02-19 9:05 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-02-19 9:56 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-19 10:14 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-02-19 20:00 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-02-19 10:40 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-02-19 10:55 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-19 11:17 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2021-02-19 11:24 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-17 10:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: Make alloc_contig_range handle in-use " Oscar Salvador
2021-02-17 13:36 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-17 13:46 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-02-17 13:54 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-17 15:06 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-17 15:27 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-02-17 15:33 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-18 6:01 ` Oscar Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210219111703.GA20286@linux \
--to=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).