On Fri 2021-02-19 16:18:38, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 1:19 PM Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
> > > > > > ? Does not make sense and changelog does not help.
> > > > >
> > > > > This is an unused variable which is in the driver
> > > > > (same as the regulator). Should I provide a patch on its own for that
> > > > > or just describe in the changelog?
> > > >
> > > > Lets do separate patch here. DT changes will need Ack from Rob, this
> > > > can go in directly.
> > >
> > > Okay, I will submit a separate patch
> > >
> > > > Can you or Dan submit patch getting the regulator support to work? If
> > > > not, I guess we should remove the regulator support after all.
> > >
> > > To be true I am fairly new to the kernel and have no idea
> > > how to test this. So no, I don't want provide a patch (except
> > > for removing), sorry.
> >
> > No problem. It seems Andy submitted series for this.
> 
> Ah, now I understand what you, Sven, meant.
> I didn't touch regulator code, so it left the same, but making it work
> probably needs just enabling during ->probe().

Yep, sorry, I was confused.

Anyway, I'd rather seen patch fixing the regulator code than removing
it completely.

Best regards,
								Pavel
-- 
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek