From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55A5C433DB for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 09:14:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897FB61493 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 09:14:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230240AbhBVJOG (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Feb 2021 04:14:06 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47038 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230207AbhBVJLE (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Feb 2021 04:11:04 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x330.google.com (mail-wm1-x330.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::330]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A788C061786 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 01:10:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x330.google.com with SMTP id i7so7042445wmb.0 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 01:10:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=F7jrUpzBO9ZQ9MHhBQ0zn1/FHacDR4Gte2WZnAPt3Ec=; b=g+jBAscd5RBgO+9Xj1Bxg3rvzU4/REW/h8W0fkKyz3nrmSRS3azT+g1bpiyX7ZbSSX AC8RSiOE9k7XIrVJKhYEdAHfvJuCI27gXnBPdHRTckJVcZH3hXkbFUGOY1cvh3ISjqkd EGCom/xFs5Em37gnp4iD/aBVZLUrFor3lRhrVb80WqDRf6GgZEkCsQ1XvoSPvOKzXz+V HIx3W4ZuD3dZ5XEpmuVAVylSsk6CYG2IcR3mT0eu7px0nJwDWS86sN4XguCk8ot0YU3f MGY6BA4wO5QFyXk9B0kG36RGIbb1AdqvrG79stwdS3AdP3u51BMQfsz6mJVNmugC5GmZ DB3w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=F7jrUpzBO9ZQ9MHhBQ0zn1/FHacDR4Gte2WZnAPt3Ec=; b=HCeoiJXGngHZMrcqQeYK9x7lleH0ECI4lNzfjN8zkEnHqwUtGrDv7lZ7IAKjKjA1+N iw3zcl3KCngtttZ+jZ/sLDSO13+m+ztDO5Kl7kq1eHetX/pTCoiP1lck6ioOzeibuDp1 8CigMPOHi9xm9ncyJr46Km+AJEwSGajQMdyDD78dHup8Stms5y5wJudbgaxPYg5MFq79 VJv8SE/UTNxwhA4BXqZs0wlM/lsIvaN6oFEjUge2mHj0y0kO0w2vr16WMNht/T42hvCI HzXr8TJekXTguyAdfYRyuzprM9E5HGJUDqwPkF9UcB8HAAxOwKWTvSjr96+A/HEdS8Yt sU1w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533iUMdoSq7eiCUzRRR4q573wfwsPYZI4qr0dI5jSi4PZkSRmaPT B1eHhDEbTqG4yfOWaNKjPNdoEg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxEMk6S8xAXLAW9n+JVEs96/oBry9X4LcAHKq2CXrz14JPPdrb0jtfLDpTdRAAbTwEQFrqdzg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:4683:: with SMTP id t125mr19068441wma.75.1613985022217; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 01:10:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from dell ([91.110.221.155]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d15sm13470211wrb.43.2021.02.22.01.10.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 22 Feb 2021 01:10:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 09:10:19 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Wolfram Sang Cc: "Jonas Mark (BT-FIR/ENG1-Grb)" , Adam Thomson , Support Opensource , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" , Steve Twiss , "marek.vasut@gmail.com" , "RUAN Tingquan (BT-FIR/ENG1-Zhu)" , "Streidl Hubert (BT-FIR/ENG1-Grb)" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mfd: da9063: Support SMBus and I2C mode Message-ID: <20210222091019.GC376568@dell> References: <20210208152758.13093-1-mark.jonas@de.bosch.com> <90bd35fa8c6f420fb1656c678c016509@de.bosch.com> <20210220110718.GA953@ninjato> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20210220110718.GA953@ninjato> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 20 Feb 2021, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > Is the patch already on the way upstream? > > Can't really speak for Lee here, but during the merge window patches are > usually not applied. So, in something like 2 weeks, usually collecting > for the next cycle begins. Looking at the CC list, I think you added all > the relevant people, so it seems all good. Wolfram is correct. I'm not planning on taking patches again until -rc1 is out. Patch looks okay at first glance though. A proper review will be provided in due course. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog