linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 19/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Use high bits for host/mmu writable masks for EPT SPTEs
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 12:47:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210225204749.1512652-20-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210225204749.1512652-1-seanjc@google.com>

Use bits 57 and 58 for HOST_WRITABLE and MMU_WRITABLE when using EPT.
This will allow using bit 11 as a constant MMU_PRESENT, which is
desirable as checking for a shadow-present SPTE is one of the most
common SPTE operations in KVM, particular in hot paths such as page
faults.

EPT is short on low available bits; currently only bit 11 is the only
always-available bit.  Bit 10 is also available, but only while KVM
doesn't support mode-based execution.  On the other hand, PAE paging
doesn't have _any_ high available bits.  Thus, using bit 11 is the only
feasible option for MMU_PRESENT.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c |  3 +++
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
index 2329ba60c67a..d12acf5eb871 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
@@ -295,6 +295,9 @@ void kvm_mmu_set_ept_masks(bool has_ad_bits, bool has_exec_only)
 	shadow_acc_track_mask	= VMX_EPT_RWX_MASK;
 	shadow_me_mask		= 0ull;
 
+	shadow_host_writable_mask = EPT_SPTE_HOST_WRITABLE;
+	shadow_mmu_writable_mask  = EPT_SPTE_MMU_WRITABLE;
+
 	/*
 	 * EPT Misconfigurations are generated if the value of bits 2:0
 	 * of an EPT paging-structure entry is 110b (write/execute).
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
index 287540d211a9..8996baa8da15 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
@@ -57,8 +57,39 @@ static_assert(SPTE_TDP_AD_ENABLED_MASK == 0);
 	(((address) >> PT64_LEVEL_SHIFT(level)) & ((1 << PT64_LEVEL_BITS) - 1))
 #define SHADOW_PT_INDEX(addr, level) PT64_INDEX(addr, level)
 
-#define DEFAULT_SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE	BIT_ULL(10)
-#define DEFAULT_SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE	BIT_ULL(11)
+/* Bits 9 and 10 are ignored by all non-EPT PTEs. */
+#define DEFAULT_SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE	BIT_ULL(9)
+#define DEFAULT_SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE	BIT_ULL(10)
+
+/*
+ * The mask/shift to use for saving the original R/X bits when marking the PTE
+ * as not-present for access tracking purposes. We do not save the W bit as the
+ * PTEs being access tracked also need to be dirty tracked, so the W bit will be
+ * restored only when a write is attempted to the page.  This mask obviously
+ * must not overlap the A/D type mask.
+ */
+#define SHADOW_ACC_TRACK_SAVED_BITS_MASK (PT64_EPT_READABLE_MASK | \
+					  PT64_EPT_EXECUTABLE_MASK)
+#define SHADOW_ACC_TRACK_SAVED_BITS_SHIFT 54
+#define SHADOW_ACC_TRACK_SAVED_MASK	(SHADOW_ACC_TRACK_SAVED_BITS_MASK << \
+					 SHADOW_ACC_TRACK_SAVED_BITS_SHIFT)
+static_assert(!(SPTE_TDP_AD_MASK & SHADOW_ACC_TRACK_SAVED_MASK));
+
+/*
+ * Low ignored bits are at a premium for EPT, use high ignored bits, taking care
+ * to not overlap the A/D type mask or the saved access bits of access-tracked
+ * SPTEs when A/D bits are disabled.
+ */
+#define EPT_SPTE_HOST_WRITABLE		BIT_ULL(57)
+#define EPT_SPTE_MMU_WRITABLE		BIT_ULL(58)
+
+static_assert(!(EPT_SPTE_HOST_WRITABLE & SPTE_TDP_AD_MASK));
+static_assert(!(EPT_SPTE_MMU_WRITABLE & SPTE_TDP_AD_MASK));
+static_assert(!(EPT_SPTE_HOST_WRITABLE & SHADOW_ACC_TRACK_SAVED_MASK));
+static_assert(!(EPT_SPTE_MMU_WRITABLE & SHADOW_ACC_TRACK_SAVED_MASK));
+
+/* Defined only to keep the above static asserts readable. */
+#undef SHADOW_ACC_TRACK_SAVED_MASK
 
 /*
  * Due to limited space in PTEs, the MMIO generation is a 20 bit subset of
@@ -128,19 +159,6 @@ extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_nonpresent_or_rsvd_mask;
  */
 #define SHADOW_NONPRESENT_OR_RSVD_MASK_LEN 5
 
-/*
- * The mask/shift to use for saving the original R/X bits when marking the PTE
- * as not-present for access tracking purposes. We do not save the W bit as the
- * PTEs being access tracked also need to be dirty tracked, so the W bit will be
- * restored only when a write is attempted to the page.  This mask obviously
- * must not overlap the A/D type mask.
- */
-#define SHADOW_ACC_TRACK_SAVED_BITS_MASK (PT64_EPT_READABLE_MASK | \
-					  PT64_EPT_EXECUTABLE_MASK)
-#define SHADOW_ACC_TRACK_SAVED_BITS_SHIFT 54
-static_assert(!(SPTE_TDP_AD_MASK & (SHADOW_ACC_TRACK_SAVED_BITS_MASK <<
-				    SHADOW_ACC_TRACK_SAVED_BITS_SHIFT)));
-
 /*
  * If a thread running without exclusive control of the MMU lock must perform a
  * multi-part operation on an SPTE, it can set the SPTE to REMOVED_SPTE as a
-- 
2.30.1.766.gb4fecdf3b7-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-25 21:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-25 20:47 [PATCH 00/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Introduce MMU_PRESENT and fix bugs Sean Christopherson
2021-02-25 20:47 ` [PATCH 01/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Set SPTE_AD_WRPROT_ONLY_MASK if and only if PML is enabled Sean Christopherson
2021-02-25 20:47 ` [PATCH 02/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Check for shadow-present SPTE before querying A/D status Sean Christopherson
2021-02-25 20:47 ` [PATCH 03/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Bail from fast_page_fault() if SPTE is not shadow-present Sean Christopherson
2021-02-25 20:47 ` [PATCH 04/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Disable MMIO caching if MMIO value collides with L1TF Sean Christopherson
2021-02-25 20:47 ` [PATCH 05/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Retry page faults that hit an invalid memslot Sean Christopherson
2021-02-25 20:47 ` [PATCH 06/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Don't install bogus MMIO SPTEs if MMIO caching is disabled Sean Christopherson
2021-02-25 20:47 ` [PATCH 07/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Handle MMIO SPTEs directly in mmu_set_spte() Sean Christopherson
2021-02-25 20:47 ` [PATCH 08/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop redundant trace_kvm_mmu_set_spte() in the TDP MMU Sean Christopherson
2021-02-25 20:47 ` [PATCH 09/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename 'mask' to 'spte' in MMIO SPTE helpers Sean Christopherson
2021-02-25 20:47 ` [PATCH 10/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Stop using software available bits to denote MMIO SPTEs Sean Christopherson
2021-02-25 20:47 ` [PATCH 11/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Add module param to disable MMIO caching (for testing) Sean Christopherson
2021-02-25 20:47 ` [PATCH 12/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename and document A/D scheme for TDP SPTEs Sean Christopherson
2021-02-25 20:47 ` [PATCH 13/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Use MMIO SPTE bits 53 and 52 for the MMIO generation Sean Christopherson
2021-02-25 20:47 ` [PATCH 14/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Document dependency bewteen TDP A/D type and saved bits Sean Christopherson
2021-02-25 20:47 ` [PATCH 15/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Move initial kvm_mmu_set_mask_ptes() call into MMU proper Sean Christopherson
2021-02-25 20:47 ` [PATCH 16/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Co-locate code for setting various SPTE masks Sean Christopherson
2021-02-25 20:47 ` [PATCH 17/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Move logic for setting SPTE masks for EPT into the MMU proper Sean Christopherson
2021-02-25 20:47 ` [PATCH 18/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Make Host-writable and MMU-writable bit locations dynamic Sean Christopherson
2021-02-25 20:47 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2021-02-25 20:47 ` [PATCH 20/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Use a dedicated bit to track shadow/MMU-present SPTEs Sean Christopherson
2021-03-08 18:52   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-03-08 19:48     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-08 20:11     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-08 21:49       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-02-25 20:47 ` [PATCH 21/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Tweak auditing WARN for A/D bits to !PRESENT (was MMIO) Sean Christopherson
2021-05-06 23:05   ` Matteo Croce
2021-05-07  7:38     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-25 20:47 ` [PATCH 22/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Use is_removed_spte() instead of open coded equivalents Sean Christopherson
2021-02-25 20:47 ` [PATCH 23/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Use low available bits for removed SPTEs Sean Christopherson
2021-02-25 20:47 ` [PATCH 24/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Dump reserved bits if they're detected on non-MMIO SPTE Sean Christopherson
2021-02-26  9:38 ` [PATCH 00/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Introduce MMU_PRESENT and fix bugs Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210225204749.1512652-20-seanjc@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).