From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
"Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lgoncalv@redhat.com>,
lwn@lwn.net, jslaby@suse.cz
Subject: Re: futex breakage in 4.9 stable branch
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2021 08:35:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210301083549.GF641347@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YDygp3WYafzcgt+s@kroah.com>
On Mon, 01 Mar 2021, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 01:13:08AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-02-23 at 15:00 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > I'm announcing the release of the 4.9.258 kernel.
> > >
> > > All users of the 4.9 kernel series must upgrade.
> > >
> > > The updated 4.9.y git tree can be found at:
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git linux-4.9.y
> > > and can be browsed at the normal kernel.org git web browser:
> > >
> >
> > The backported futex fixes are still incomplete/broken in this version.
> > If I enable lockdep and run the futex self-tests (from 5.10):
> >
> > - on 4.9.246, they pass with no lockdep output
> > - on 4.9.257 and 4.9.258, they pass but futex_requeue_pi trigers a
> > lockdep splat
> >
> > I have a local branch that essentially updates futex and rtmutex in
> > 4.9-stable to match 4.14-stable. With this, the tests pass and lockdep
> > is happy.
> >
> > Unfortunately, that branch has about another 60 commits. Further, the
> > more we change futex in 4.9, the more difficult it is going to be to
> > update the 4.9-rt branch. But I don't see any better option available
> > at the moment.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> There were some posted futex fixes for 4.9 (and 4.4) on the stable list
> that I have not gotten to yet.
>
> Hopefully after these are merged (this week), these issues will be
> resolved.
>
> If not, then yes, they need to be fixed and any help you can provide
> would be appreciated.
>
> As for "difficulty", yes, it's rough, but the changes backported were
> required, for obvious reasons :(
Apologies for the fuss.
The back-port become more complex the further back it was taken..
Had I known about the self-tests, I would have ensured those were
passing too, as well as the the build/boot/auto-builder tests
actually carried out.
Let me know if there's anything further I can do to help.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-01 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-23 14:00 Linux 4.9.258 Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-02-23 14:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-03-01 0:13 ` futex breakage in 4.9 stable branch Ben Hutchings
2021-03-01 8:07 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-03-01 8:35 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2021-03-01 17:29 ` Ben Hutchings
2021-03-04 9:12 ` Mike Galbraith
2021-03-04 13:11 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-03-04 13:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2021-03-04 18:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-05 6:41 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210301083549.GF641347@dell \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=lgoncalv@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lwn@lwn.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).