From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Justin Forbes <jforbes@redhat.com>,
Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>,
Frank Eigler <fche@redhat.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] gcc-plugins: Handle GCC version mismatch for OOT modules
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 14:31:50 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210303203150.jwupthv6siil6tn2@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210303202406.bxgdx5a25j6wc43b@treble>
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 02:24:12PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 11:57:33AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 11:38 AM Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > But in the meantime, making the plugins depend on the gcc version some
> > > > way is certainly better than not doing so.
> > >
> > > So currently, the plugins already so that. They require the GCC version
> > > to be exact. If there's a mismatch, then it fails the OOT module build.
> >
> > That's not my experience.
> >
> > Yes, the build fails, but it fails not by _rebuilding_, but by failing
> > with an error.
>
> Um, that's what I said. It does not rebuild. It fails with an error.
>
> The *proposal* is to rebuild the plugin -- which Masahiro nacked because
> he claims GCC mismatches aren't supported for OOT builds (plugin or
> not).
>
> Your nack is for a different reason: GCC plugins are second-class
> citizens. Fair enough...
Or was it a nack? :-) Reading your message again, I may have
misinterpreted. Put simply, should we rebuild plugins when the GCC
version changes?
--
Josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-04 0:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-25 20:42 [PATCH RFC] gcc-plugins: Handle GCC version mismatch for OOT modules Josh Poimboeuf
2021-01-25 21:16 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-25 21:27 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-01-25 21:44 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-25 22:07 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-01-26 8:13 ` Greg KH
2021-01-26 12:44 ` Justin Forbes
2021-01-26 13:51 ` Greg KH
2021-01-26 14:51 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-01-26 15:00 ` Greg KH
2021-01-26 15:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-26 15:46 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-01-26 16:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-26 16:15 ` Justin Forbes
2021-01-26 16:19 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-01-26 17:06 ` Greg KH
2021-01-26 17:47 ` Justin Forbes
2021-01-26 16:22 ` David Laight
2021-01-27 18:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-26 8:12 ` Greg KH
2021-01-25 22:03 ` Kees Cook
2021-01-25 22:19 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-01-26 17:56 ` Kees Cook
2021-01-26 18:43 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-01-26 22:59 ` Kees Cook
2021-01-26 23:32 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-01-26 1:53 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-01-26 12:16 ` David Laight
2021-01-27 18:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-27 18:38 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-01-27 18:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-27 18:51 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-01-27 22:09 ` David Laight
2021-01-28 14:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-28 15:45 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-03-02 23:26 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-03-03 18:49 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-03-03 19:15 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-03-03 19:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-03-03 19:38 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-03-03 19:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-03-03 20:24 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-03-03 20:31 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2021-03-03 20:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-03-03 21:45 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-03-04 12:27 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-03-04 15:08 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-03-04 15:35 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-03-04 19:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-03-05 2:41 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-03-05 2:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-03-05 16:03 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-03-05 19:18 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-03-08 9:39 ` David Laight
2021-03-05 15:31 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-03-03 21:52 ` Kees Cook
2021-03-04 12:26 ` Masahiro Yamada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210303203150.jwupthv6siil6tn2@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=jforbes@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=omosnace@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).