From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Lee <leegib@gmail.com>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8192e: Fix possible buffer overflow in _rtl92e_wx_set_scan
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 10:57:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210308075735.GA21246@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210305150014.GA627584@ubuntudesktop>
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 03:00:14PM +0000, Lee wrote:
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> Do you think any of these could be potential issues:
>
> driver/staging/
>
> rtl8192e/rtllib_rx.c:2442
memcpy(dst->ssid, src->ssid, src->ssid_len);
Smatch says that at this point we know "src->ssid_len" is in the 1-32
range. This is without any fixes to how Smatch parses nl_len().
> wlan-ng/cfg80211.c:316
313 if (request->n_ssids > 0) {
314 msg1.scantype.data = P80211ENUM_scantype_active;
315 msg1.ssid.data.len = request->ssids->ssid_len;
316 memcpy(msg1.ssid.data.data,
317 request->ssids->ssid, request->ssids->ssid_len);
318 } else {
The only thing Smatch knows about "request->ssids->ssid_len" is that
it's 0-255. I had not marked "msg1.ssid.data.data" as a protected
struct member so it didn't generate a warning.
I think cfg80211_scan_request structs are filled out in a systematic
way in ieee80211_request_ibss_scan() and they're bounds checked properly
so this isn't a bug.
> rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c:1591
> rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c:2738
Same.
regards,
dan carpenter
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-08 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-26 11:48 [PATCH] staging: rtl8192e: Fix possible buffer overflow in _rtl92e_wx_set_scan Lee Gibson
2021-02-26 12:06 ` Greg KH
2021-02-26 12:30 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-02-26 13:43 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-02-26 14:05 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-03-01 13:25 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-03-01 15:37 ` Lee
2021-03-05 8:22 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-03-05 15:00 ` Lee
2021-03-08 7:57 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210308075735.GA21246@kadam \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=leegib@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).