From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E04DC433E6 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:53:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB7264FBB for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:53:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231785AbhCJQwn (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:52:43 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:40928 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230147AbhCJQwK (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:52:10 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C8B7B64FC3; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:52:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1615395130; bh=fblKNntOKs+r+Hk8T8EVXTYLBjqZfnQB55Ec28BK85w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=UiJhmR9Msd4dJcCAI3JQh5cFCa2RPKi+AAUyhajhmxZx/fdhIvPQvMtRG2/3fHHc9 HqqPR1e1v/DoDIvPFXMiv+G1I1U3bg8GJtKw7Zz5VCHEByz1fZ8H8zLcuxYRH0m3x+ DU97IXKJGEJxqgmuP1L7UH6zXbKycS2INQ8lm0DL45TiZe/Wo2tHL65iyN6M099JgS W1PdxgMnGZBeBES6UvyxgihEtG6h4Xc457fEisSdpRG/Zy4SPIZB/R/Wj1eg6FfafE dxUrzuF28JcgGb+BZem0wdPYmtjrQGjeky8kLhVVAtcNVcrJ0Fq0mfz9PHjeNQ+rxc +4KyBWZhgC5nQ== Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:50:58 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Takashi Iwai Cc: Pierre-Louis Bossart , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Kai Vehmanen , Liam Girdwood , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai , Ranjani Sridharan , linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Jon Hunter , Bard liao Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] ASoC: soc-core: Prevent warning if no DMI table is present Message-ID: <20210310165058.GC28564@sirena.org.uk> References: <20210303115526.419458-1-jonathanh@nvidia.com> <91480f92-a3f5-e71f-acdc-ea74488ab0a1@linux.intel.com> <20210310133534.GD4746@sirena.org.uk> <6a2352e6-f2b7-def1-de58-52fbeb7846e5@linux.intel.com> <20210310161814.GA28564@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="E13BgyNx05feLLmH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Yow! Are we laid back yet? User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --E13BgyNx05feLLmH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 05:37:25PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > Mark Brown wrote: > > > did you mean if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI)) ? > > Is there a runtime check? > Well, basically both DMI and ACPI are completely different things, so > I don't think it's right to check the availability of ACPI as a signal > of the availability of DMI. In theory they are only somewhat related, but in practice they're both part of a holistic system model - ACPI users complain if their system does not also provide DMI information. --E13BgyNx05feLLmH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmBI+PEACgkQJNaLcl1U h9AKhwf/TqggBJ9cnL1UX9G9mZNlGaHbKXQez9oZGubvZ8Ejuhu4f1AUQyMXtX97 N7xUBWv6Tk+rVC3eq7ocQki9aEDHy2mSp7Lraw2/7k3Y94C54oO43n5hOzPiJxhk VoBOVYEGgC1YHuG9Jyulpq7Q6ERCJTT0cxdLVlrgMosofWkw0osp2UGcCCST8Kjt tRM6ayTyRWhtIJX62WDKFdzV8EBodR2E8h1WA7kMb5yD0N4fxZEXhdWRPBk7DjMU YvSFWtTsKQMP2cTRTtxSI5q3QfBOGcx069FteBw40uMkCBdYGq3Eieb8wRnQ3Ip3 K1On2WnwhEx9MDLvlqzkRqvM/X6kGQ== =7qIj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --E13BgyNx05feLLmH--