From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
To: Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Chaitanya Kulkarni <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"lkp@lists.01.org" <lkp@lists.01.org>,
"lkp@intel.com" <lkp@intel.com>,
Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [mm/highmem] 61b205f579: WARNING:at_mm/highmem.c:#__kmap_local_sched_out
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 00:37:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210316073756.GQ3014244@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210312062755.GA5022@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>
Adding Thomas. Thomas I've been looking into the following test failure:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210304083825.GB17830@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/
See below.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 02:27:55PM +0800, Oliver Sang wrote:
> Hi Ira,
[snip]
> > > >
> > > > caused below changes (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace):
> > >
> > > Is the fix for this been posted yet ?
> >
> > No. I've been unable to reproduce it yet.
>
> just FYI
> the issue does not always happen but the rate on 61b205f579 is not low,
> while we didn't observe it happen on parent commit.
>
> bb90d4bc7b6a536b 61b205f579911a11f0b576f7327
> ---------------- ---------------------------
> fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs
> | | |
> :38 16% 6:38 dmesg.EIP:__kmap_local_sched_in
> :38 16% 6:38 dmesg.EIP:__kmap_local_sched_out
> :38 16% 6:38 dmesg.WARNING:at_mm/highmem.c:#__kmap_local_sched_in
> :38 16% 6:38 dmesg.WARNING:at_mm/highmem.c:#__kmap_local_sched_out
>
> also please permit me to quote our internal analysis by Zhengjun (cced)
> (Thanks a lot, Zhengjun)
>
> "the commit has the potential to cause the issue.
> It replaces " kmap_atomic" to " kmap_local_page".
>
> Most of the two API is the same, except for " kmap_atomic" disable preemption and cannot sleep.
> I check the issue happened when there is a preemption, in FBC " kmap_local_page",
> the preemption is enabled, the issue may happen."
> "
I think I see the issue. I think this is an invalid configuration.
00:26:43 > grep DEBUG_KMAP config-5.11.0-rc7-00002-g61b205f57991
CONFIG_DEBUG_KMAP_LOCAL=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_KMAP_LOCAL_FORCE_MAP=y
00:26:48 > grep DEBUG_HIGHMEM config-5.11.0-rc7-00002-g61b205f57991
# CONFIG_DEBUG_HIGHMEM is not set
DEBUG_KMAP_LOCAL causes guard pages to be added to the kmap_ctrl array. But
DEBUG_HIGHMEM is used in __kmap_local_sched_out() to check the guard pages.
DEBUG_HIGHMEM is supposed to select DEBUG_KMAP_LOCAL... but apparently that
did not happen when this configuration was made.
I still have not hit this condition in my testing. Could you ensure that
DEBUG_HIGMEM is set and rerun the test to see if I am correct?
Thomas wouldn't the following enable checks make more sense? Or perhaps be
more consistent with the processing of kmap_ctrl?
Ira
diff --git a/mm/highmem.c b/mm/highmem.c
index 86f2b9495f9c..6ef8f5e05e7e 100644
--- a/mm/highmem.c
+++ b/mm/highmem.c
@@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ void __kmap_local_sched_out(void)
int idx;
/* With debug all even slots are unmapped and act as guard */
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_HIGHMEM) && !(i & 0x01)) {
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_KMAP_LOCAL) && !(i & 0x01)) {
WARN_ON_ONCE(!pte_none(pteval));
continue;
}
@@ -654,7 +654,7 @@ void __kmap_local_sched_in(void)
int idx;
/* With debug all even slots are unmapped and act as guard */
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_HIGHMEM) && !(i & 0x01)) {
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_KMAP_LOCAL) && !(i & 0x01)) {
WARN_ON_ONCE(!pte_none(pteval));
continue;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-16 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-04 8:38 [mm/highmem] 61b205f579: WARNING:at_mm/highmem.c:#__kmap_local_sched_out kernel test robot
2021-03-09 20:53 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-03-11 16:02 ` Ira Weiny
2021-03-12 6:27 ` Oliver Sang
2021-03-16 7:37 ` Ira Weiny [this message]
2021-03-17 13:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-18 23:08 ` Ira Weiny
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210316073756.GQ3014244@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com \
--to=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).