linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@fb.com, mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] rcu: Provide polling interfaces for Tree RCU grace periods
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 09:51:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210316165101.GW2696@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210316151750.GF639918@lothringen>

On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:17:50PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 04:26:30PM -0800, paulmck@kernel.org wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * poll_state_synchronize_rcu - Conditionally wait for an RCU grace period
> > + *
> > + * @oldstate: return from call to get_state_synchronize_rcu() or start_poll_synchronize_rcu()
> > + *
> > + * If a full RCU grace period has elapsed since the earlier call from
> > + * which oldstate was obtained, return @true, otherwise return @false.
> > + * Otherwise, invoke synchronize_rcu() to wait for a full grace period.
> > + *
> > + * Yes, this function does not take counter wrap into account.
> > + * But counter wrap is harmless.  If the counter wraps, we have waited for
> > + * more than 2 billion grace periods (and way more on a 64-bit system!).
> > + * Those needing to keep oldstate values for very long time periods
> > + * (many hours even on 32-bit systems) should check them occasionally
> > + * and either refresh them or set a flag indicating that the grace period
> > + * has completed.
> > + */
> > +bool poll_state_synchronize_rcu(unsigned long oldstate)
> > +{
> > +	if (rcu_seq_done(&rcu_state.gp_seq, oldstate)) {
> > +		smp_mb(); /* Ensure GP ends before subsequent accesses. */
> 
> Also as usual I'm a bit lost with the reason behind those memory barriers.
> So this is ordering the read on rcu_state.gp_seq against something (why not an
> smp_rmb() btw?). And what does it pair with?

Because it needs to order subsequent writes as well as reads.

It is ordering whatever the RCU user wishes to put after the call to
poll_state_synchronize_rcu() with whatever the RCU user put before
whatever started the grace period that just now completed.  Please
see the synchronize_rcu() comment header for the statement of the
guarantee.  Or that of call_rcu().

For more detail on how these guarantees are implemented, please see
Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.rst
and its many diagrams.

There are a lot of memory barriers that pair and form larger cycles to
implement this guarantee.  Pretty much all of the calls to the infamous
smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() macro form cycles involving this barrier,
for example.

Please do not hesitate to ask more questions.  This underpins RCU.

							Thanx, Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-16 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-04  0:26 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/3] Polling RCU grace-period interfaces for v5.13 Paul E. McKenney
2021-03-04  0:26 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] rcu: Provide polling interfaces for Tree RCU grace periods paulmck
2021-03-12 12:21   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-12 12:26   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-15 23:11     ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-03-16 14:47   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-16 16:42     ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-03-16 15:17   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-16 16:51     ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2021-03-18 14:59       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-18 17:09         ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-03-19 13:58   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-19 17:51     ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-03-19 22:10       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-19 23:38         ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-03-19 23:47           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-04  0:26 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/3] rcu: Provide polling interfaces for Tiny " paulmck
2021-03-21 22:28   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-22 15:47     ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-03-22 19:00       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-22 19:45         ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-03-23 14:02           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-23 16:45             ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-03-04  0:26 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/3] rcutorture: Test start_poll_synchronize_rcu() and poll_state_synchronize_rcu() paulmck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210316165101.GW2696@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72 \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).