From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D9E1C433E9 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 16:13:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB0B964F3B for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 16:13:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231871AbhCRQNY (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:13:24 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:36602 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231806AbhCRQNA (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:13:00 -0400 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f0fad00070f6d4b275c681b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0f:ad00:70f:6d4b:275c:681b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 6FF7E1EC0591; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 17:12:58 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1616083978; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=iYAk+sBJZsOFN0LDj0WLxWQznRPOAKXobgPMm4BR1jY=; b=iZU645W5+QzgvAjHSsEnafuzbLMH+MFR6eKTL53NMcfWNWWCuVIioJi0L2FcA2BLpKT06m gJ/GltvmLMHhfRDWQB3kSksfu1SSX1G6ndpxcKb9xM3QyQvZNQNP9TmzLtd/IW6rREqyu3 P+M28m7Fx9Fzv71SMDm+OIAzp4gn0J4= Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 17:13:01 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: "Yu, Yu-cheng" Cc: x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Andy Lutomirski , Balbir Singh , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Florian Weimer , "H.J. Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , Oleg Nesterov , Pavel Machek , Peter Zijlstra , Randy Dunlap , "Ravi V. Shankar" , Vedvyas Shanbhogue , Dave Martin , Weijiang Yang , Pengfei Xu , Haitao Huang , Peter Collingbourne , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH v23 21/28] mm: Re-introduce vm_flags to do_mmap() Message-ID: <20210318161301.GG19570@zn.tnic> References: <20210316151054.5405-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20210316151054.5405-22-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20210318114232.GD19570@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 08:59:28AM -0700, Yu, Yu-cheng wrote: > Right, do_mmap_pgoff() was removed by commit 45e55300f114. This patch does > not add back the wrapper. Instead, add vm_flags to do_mmap(). Please advice > if I misunderstand the question. I'm just wondering why you even need to mention do_mmap_pgoff() since that thing is gone now... Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette