From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24521C433E3 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:10:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7BB361A09 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:10:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234507AbhCXJJw (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Mar 2021 05:09:52 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:52844 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234461AbhCXJJp (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Mar 2021 05:09:45 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D9EC619C9; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:09:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1616576985; bh=jnRQ8XZk0O0MVorAp4ULBhBFeVXaOntVyd1dhKGu/08=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=J9SxtN4tax4jDCHzd7N2lDjj/TnkkirePg7ebZQZFE14lMDngpFfc1MMbZ6M5yE8r ZU6Ta8fVY0MHn6l1LHxaI6D2AAMXJlLAkM4TVQ5Dvcu6KbTC2pPHoApRXO+X5bo1Sa tA9tgMnawow1GlrTJSK3cCEP0Hc+v8OgITKyw6liFGLoCmb3Xsq3zNKImNxbU1j76c ES1vqy2c4TYHlx3Yr/N2bgG7Ub5zFG3H2ThQztLUD2uL8cHZGyeKN3w/dhCLPeG668 ahyRkW0k2tmt8dAU/PcQTOokqNikXMrX0K+wQvEGZCDo7QC80LmKqiBIpyAhHmBAUG 4TKpcgPS9iGHw== Received: by pali.im (Postfix) id 6F3F2A7E; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 10:09:42 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 10:09:42 +0100 From: Pali =?utf-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?= To: Jianjun Wang Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Rob Herring , Marc Zyngier , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Ryder Lee , Philipp Zabel , Matthias Brugger , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, youlin.pei@mediatek.com, chuanjia.liu@mediatek.com, qizhong.cheng@mediatek.com, sin_jieyang@mediatek.com, drinkcat@chromium.org, Rex-BC.Chen@mediatek.com, anson.chuang@mediatek.com, Krzysztof Wilczyski Subject: Re: [v9,2/7] PCI: Export pci_pio_to_address() for module use Message-ID: <20210324090942.kmhxnxzm7tz3ynuy@pali> References: <20210324030510.29177-1-jianjun.wang@mediatek.com> <20210324030510.29177-3-jianjun.wang@mediatek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210324030510.29177-3-jianjun.wang@mediatek.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 24 March 2021 11:05:05 Jianjun Wang wrote: > This interface will be used by PCI host drivers for PIO translation, > export it to support compiling those drivers as kernel modules. > > Signed-off-by: Jianjun Wang > --- > drivers/pci/pci.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c > index 16a17215f633..12bba221c9f2 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c > @@ -4052,6 +4052,7 @@ phys_addr_t pci_pio_to_address(unsigned long pio) > > return address; > } > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_pio_to_address); Hello! I'm not sure if EXPORT_SYMBOL is correct because file has GPL-2.0 header. Should not be in this case used only EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL? Maybe other people would know what is correct? > > unsigned long __weak pci_address_to_pio(phys_addr_t address) > { > -- > 2.25.1 >