From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E5BBC433E1 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 16:30:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75FFC61A2C for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 16:30:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229764AbhCYQaA (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2021 12:30:00 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:51932 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229666AbhCYQ32 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2021 12:29:28 -0400 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f0d5d002e2bf1176a5b9def.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0d:5d00:2e2b:f117:6a5b:9def]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id ACE2A1EC0324; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 17:29:26 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1616689766; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=U5AbQYqSWYiIyNY16bCDiOGriUAPmZSlf40Ry/wtqLY=; b=pvgGt8lu2T1nrG6UKKpAqFrefEPVbQlxEf8B0KE7H+xry5fswYBQ77VGZbkqlESRguu88C BcdoA7l9Ya8wPyloj2ZRlmpVWFw47l5Esa1k9d78sYNCOJnnQmOJu8fYCgDLR8ZKFE4g3+ ujwyHWx2cHgWPrKiLJ7B6TYeJD82ouA= Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 17:29:30 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Brijesh Singh Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Joerg Roedel , "H. Peter Anvin" , Tony Luck , Dave Hansen , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , Paolo Bonzini , Tom Lendacky , David Rientjes , Sean Christopherson Subject: Re: [RFC Part1 PATCH 01/13] x86/cpufeatures: Add SEV-SNP CPU feature Message-ID: <20210325162930.GF31322@zn.tnic> References: <20210324164424.28124-1-brijesh.singh@amd.com> <20210324164424.28124-2-brijesh.singh@amd.com> <20210325105417.GE31322@zn.tnic> <98917857-69d2-971c-d78d-b1d60159c037@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <98917857-69d2-971c-d78d-b1d60159c037@amd.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 09:50:20AM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote: > For the early feedback I was trying to find one tree which can be used > for building both the guest and hypervisor at once. In future, I will > submit the part-1 against the tip/master and part-2 against the > kvm/master. thanks Then I think you could base ontop of current linux-next because it has both trees. I presume test-applying the patches on our trees then should work. I think... Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette